<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10939621#post10939621 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by honda2sk
but even the experts over at LA tell you to QT them....
As long as a fish is eating when they arrive (this is easy to test in an acclimation bucket by adding a few small bits of food) and appears externally healthy, then I believe that a QT is, more often than not, for the safety of the other fish in the tank.
I understand that the concept of a QT is valid for most fish, but there are some that are, in my eyes, better suited by being in the display ASAP should they not demonstrate problems on arrival. The downsides of a QT (size, less water stability, lack of an established reef environment, etc) are more detrimental in these
few cases (mandarin, regal angel, achilles tang are my personal experiences that I believe warranted this deviance).
I agree that a QT is a good general rule, I'm just a firm believer that there are a few fish who are more sensitive to their environment as a whole for various reasons and therefore represent exceptions. Usually these are considered risky fish anyway and thus are exceptions to most rules as is.
In order to minimize the potential for pathogen introduction with this practice, I would only ever order fish that I plan on bypassing a QT with from the Diver's Den.
I hope that explains it a bit better despite my tiredness!
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10939621#post10939621 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by honda2sk
on a side note, how are your regals doing guys? how long have you had them? [/B]
He's doing fantastic. He literally eats everything I throw at him (with the exception of cyclopeeze which I believe is probably just too small for him). Here's a picture of my beautiful boy (as evidenced by his large gill spines):