just looking to improve my noname skimmer.
technically, getting the drain directly into the skimmer is the most efficient. however, with this nonamer, there isnt a cost effective way to mod the thick acrylic.
so i figured: T the drain directly into the pump. the T is to account for the 2 (are there more?) possibilities:
1. drain is more than pump can handle, so it diverts into the open end of the T.
2. pump needs more than drain can provide, so it pulls in more water from the open end of the T.
<img src="http://reefcentral.com/gallery/data/500/116775dmod.jpg"/>
so, before i start spending money on plumbing, has anyone tried this? results? thoughts? what am i not seeing (gotta be something)?
remember, this is for a skimmer i already have, with a mazzei injector. just trying to get the most out of it.
i am aware of the "mod" that sets the drain directly to the skimmer, and it is what i referred to when i said "i want a cost effective and viable option to this 'mod' ".
other than cost and hassle, the reason for not modding is that i will eventually be getting an asm g3. so i just want to use what i have for now and save the money/work for the upgrade, the acrylic is thick and i dont want to risk cracking and losing it.
so i came up with this work-around.
the skimmer body is about 20" high and 4" diam. i can either use an eheim 1250, or rio 2100 (runs warmer), and a big mazzei injector.
i tried the equipment forum first, but didnt get any answers. just a few "it wont work" statements, but with no explanation why it wouldnt/couldnt.
i am trying to figure out if the drain is capable of running 600gph and the return pump is matching it, why a pump rated at or below would cause an issue. as the water it does not intake will be released via the out? and if it was pulling in more water, it would just pull from the open end of the T, no?
i have no clue if this would work or not, im just the type of guy that likes to know why. true knowledge comes from understanding, not the simple acknowledgement of a fact.
besides, if i know what is wrong with the design, i may be able to ammend and improve it
thanks so far for the help
nemo G
technically, getting the drain directly into the skimmer is the most efficient. however, with this nonamer, there isnt a cost effective way to mod the thick acrylic.
so i figured: T the drain directly into the pump. the T is to account for the 2 (are there more?) possibilities:
1. drain is more than pump can handle, so it diverts into the open end of the T.
2. pump needs more than drain can provide, so it pulls in more water from the open end of the T.
<img src="http://reefcentral.com/gallery/data/500/116775dmod.jpg"/>
so, before i start spending money on plumbing, has anyone tried this? results? thoughts? what am i not seeing (gotta be something)?
remember, this is for a skimmer i already have, with a mazzei injector. just trying to get the most out of it.
i am aware of the "mod" that sets the drain directly to the skimmer, and it is what i referred to when i said "i want a cost effective and viable option to this 'mod' ".
other than cost and hassle, the reason for not modding is that i will eventually be getting an asm g3. so i just want to use what i have for now and save the money/work for the upgrade, the acrylic is thick and i dont want to risk cracking and losing it.
so i came up with this work-around.
the skimmer body is about 20" high and 4" diam. i can either use an eheim 1250, or rio 2100 (runs warmer), and a big mazzei injector.
i tried the equipment forum first, but didnt get any answers. just a few "it wont work" statements, but with no explanation why it wouldnt/couldnt.
i am trying to figure out if the drain is capable of running 600gph and the return pump is matching it, why a pump rated at or below would cause an issue. as the water it does not intake will be released via the out? and if it was pulling in more water, it would just pull from the open end of the T, no?
i have no clue if this would work or not, im just the type of guy that likes to know why. true knowledge comes from understanding, not the simple acknowledgement of a fact.
besides, if i know what is wrong with the design, i may be able to ammend and improve it
thanks so far for the help
nemo G