With all of the hoopla about BIO-SEAÃ"šÃ‚® Marinemix, it seems as if some folks have neglected some critical issues with this salt.
Primarily, from my perspective, it does not do a very good job of matching natural seawater of several ions (based on the manufacturers own data):
Lithium is 1700% of seawater (they claim that is good because it is a "metabolic stimulator")
Boron is only 5% of natural seawater levels (why the heck leave it out? It is an important pH buffer; they claim it to be a toxicity concern even at natural levels, so they leave it out on purpose: http://www.aquacraft.net/sf9908.html )
Iodide is about 1000% of seawater iodide
Sulfate (a major ion) is a whopping 24% above seawater (they claim higher sulfate is good, but give no justification:
http://www.aquacraft.net/s9910.html
Copper is much above NSW (as are many metals), and higher than my tests of IO
all data from: http://www.aquacraft.net/w0002.html
Primarily, from my perspective, it does not do a very good job of matching natural seawater of several ions (based on the manufacturers own data):
Lithium is 1700% of seawater (they claim that is good because it is a "metabolic stimulator")
Boron is only 5% of natural seawater levels (why the heck leave it out? It is an important pH buffer; they claim it to be a toxicity concern even at natural levels, so they leave it out on purpose: http://www.aquacraft.net/sf9908.html )
Iodide is about 1000% of seawater iodide
Sulfate (a major ion) is a whopping 24% above seawater (they claim higher sulfate is good, but give no justification:
http://www.aquacraft.net/s9910.html
Copper is much above NSW (as are many metals), and higher than my tests of IO
all data from: http://www.aquacraft.net/w0002.html