<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7984393#post7984393 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by snorvich
Ninong, it is my impression that supermales are terminal and cannot revert whereas derived males (from females) can revert to females. Is that correct? By the way, welcome aboard!
All supermales are secondary males. They are females first (proto-gynous) before becoming males. Primary males are males that have never been females. They were born male, or, more precisely, they were born with immature male gonads which made them males as they matured. This is known to be true for at least some of the species in the genus
Cirrhilabrus.
All
Cirrhilabrus species wrasses that were not born as primary males, are born with male and female gonads. As the fish matures, the female gonads mature first (proto-gynous). If there is a "vacancy" in the "leadership," the alpha female will begin to change into male. This process usually takes about three weeks. During that period, if a dominant male shows up and takes over, it is possible for the changing female to halt the sex change process and revert to female. However, if the sex change process is not interrupted and the fish's male gonads mature, then the female gonads will atrophy and the fish will be incapable of reverting back to a functioning female. At this point it would be considered a terminal phase male.
There is a hormone that is triggered (can't remember its name) by sociological change that activates the male gonads. When the male gonads are fully mature, they excrete a hormone that shuts down the female gonads and causes them to atrophy. It's sort of the reverse or what happens with clownfish, which are protandrous hermaphrodites. However, in both cases it is gender determination by social aggression. In the case of clownfish, the larger fish will usually grow at a faster rate than the smaller fish and that's due in part to the fact that the larger fish will prevent the smaller fish from getting to an equal amount of available food, thus ensuring that the size inequality in enhanced. Eventually both fish accept their respective roles in life and peace and tranquility prevail.
In the case of
Cirrhilabrus species fairy wrasses, one supermale will usually control a harem of several females and juveniles, sometimes more than a dozen. The females and juveniles will swim close to the bottom, while the supermale patrols a few meters above them. Any primary males, if there are any, will be at the perimeter of the harem, they will not be in the middle of the harem. If anything should happen to the supermale, the most dominant of the females will begin to change sex into male. She would take over once she becomes male, not one of the primary males. Primary males cannot control a harem.
Now, getting to your question of terminal phase males and whether they can revert. All of the literature says that male wrasses cannot revert to female once they have completed the sex change and are terminal phase males. That is even born out by microscopic examination of the gonads. However, I believe it may be possible in a captive environment (meaning an aquarium of average size, not a gigantic 750-gal plus monster) for a terminal phase male fairy wrasse to change its behavior such that two supermales will behave as if they were a mated pair. By this I mean that they will accept each other and become very friendly, even resting side by side on the sandbed. This does not include spawning behavior, just friendly acceptance and an absence of previous aggressive behavior on the part of the more dominant fish.
I believe this is what has led to some vendors who are very experienced in dealing with
Cirrhilabrus species wrasses to conclude that they are capable of sex reversal. The vendor who sold me my wrasses is convinced that terminal phase males are capable of sex reversal. He's the only person I have ever come across who believes this. In my own experience, the two supermale Scott's that I ended up with in my tank did not lose typical male coloration but they did come to an "arrangement." They engaged in friendly carouselling (slow swimming in circles behind each other) and even rested side by side on the sandbed, something they would never have done during the first 10 months together. This behavior would seem like pairing but it did not include spawning. I have no idea if both fish retained functioning male gonads or if one of them had experienced a "deactivation" of its male gonads. According to all the literature, the female gonads are kaput at this point and cannot become functional again.