<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12618398#post12618398 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by frank2926
you can use Flexible PVC that is available at Home Cheapo. It eliminates the need for most 45 or 90's.
The braided stuff is not flexible pvc. It is reinforced tubing. Hence the name. lol
Reinforced Vinyl Tubing.
http://www.savko.com/partlist.asp?pgid=4&ptid=19&pid=36
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12618398#post12618398 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by frank2926
you can use Flexible PVC that is available at Home Cheapo. It eliminates the need for most 45 or 90's.
The braided stuff is not flexible pvc. It is reinforced tubing. Hence the name. lol
Reinforced Vinyl Tubing.
http://www.savko.com/partlist.asp?pgid=4&ptid=19&pid=36
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12622503#post12622503 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by styndall
I like the flexible tubing better than PVC. Having some wiggle room in the plumbing is nice when you need to shift something to get better access or accommodate a new piece of equipment. Further, using joints or Ts with hose barbs instead of PVC glue allows insertion or removal of pieces without cutting joints or pipe sections.
Most aquarium plumbing is simpler, cleaner, and less obstructive with flexible hose than with PVC.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12624843#post12624843 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by alonso216
I see the definite advantage of being able to move things around with the flexible plumbing.
One of my concerns is that barbed connectors seem to have considerably smaller I.D. than the tubing it connects to.
As a firefighter we have to be aware of "friction loss" in our hoses. I'm bringing this mentality to my aquarium.
So now I question wether the barb connections in tubing create more "friction loss" vs the 90's & 45's used with pipe.
Maybe I should quit trying to "split the atom" ???
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12625478#post12625478 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by styndall
While I don't have any good data comparing relative flow obstruction in straight PVC joints and flexible tube with smaller-diameter barbs, I haven't experienced any significant difference in water velocity between PVC and tubing (though I'll have to cop to having had very little PVC in my system in the first place). I figure that the friction loss I experience with my hose barbs is balanced by the lack of 45 and 90 degree elbows. If I were working with really critical systems like fire hoses, I'd run tests about relative flow rates with PVC and hose, but in my aquarium, the hose performs just fine.
The relative performance is close enough that I made my choice based on ease of connection and modification.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12624843#post12624843 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by alonso216
I see the definite advantage of being able to move things around with the flexible plumbing.
One of my concerns is that barbed connectors seem to have considerably smaller I.D. than the tubing it connects to.
As a firefighter we have to be aware of "friction loss" in our hoses. I'm bringing this mentality to my aquarium.
So now I question wether the barb connections in tubing create more "friction loss" vs the 90's & 45's used with pipe.
Maybe I should quit trying to "split the atom" ???