SantaMonica
Well-known member
Wait. In the beginning of this thread you said that everything skimmers, etc. were pulling out was food for something in the tank and thats bad, and now you are intentionally killing/removing that food? And you don't find that contradictory?
That's because the screens produce TOO many pods. And as I've said from the beginning, as does Mike and Morgan at IA, that you have to kill the pods before they eat the algae. Once a week. Even at this, I still have pods swarming around the display.
I bet the chlorine and chloramine you are adding to the tank is good for your corals though.
Maybe. I'm also thawing my mysis cubes in tap, and adding that to the tank. But that's why I'm here... to test.
Only if they don't know better. And anybody that knows then they know they don't want zero readings and they know why
Difficult to follow.
And removing "food" in the process. You can't have your cake and eat it too
Come on. You are making my point for me. Yes, inorganic N and P are food: Food for algae. I hope you do know this. To the beginners reading this: This is why the algae grows as it eats up the inorganic N and P, which is what your test kits read. Algae do not eat organic N and P, which is thus left in the tank to be consumed as food.
N and P are part of the "food" you claim that is being removed from the tank
That's right. Organic (read: organic) N and P are in flake food, mysis, phyto, minced clams, pellets, live feeders, cyclopeeze, brine shrimp, daphnia, silversides, blood worms, plankton, krill, nori, prawns, worms, oyster eggs, squid, selcon, marine snow, and amino acids. That's why we want to leave organic N and P in the water. INORGANIC N and P (read: inorganic) is what we want to remove, and it's the main diet of algae (besides ammonia).
It hasn't even come close to answering my questions. I have asked them repeatedly on another site where you proclaimed this bucket the savior of the newbes and you still haven't answered them. NOT A ONE.
Than ask them here. Some of the "other sites" (which nobody here cares about) stray off-topic and don't hear what I'm saying, and demand proof, then post their own proof which they don't even review themselves, not realizing their own proof actually makes my case and dis-proves thiers. So I've limited my posting on those sites to just things I'm currently "proving", like the above LFS test which is now in it's 3rd week. If they don't want it they can delete it.
Is that your common defense? To accuse anyone who disagrees with you of working for a company that would want to quash ATS'es? You have accused me of the same thing and its getting quite old.
That's right, I forgot I asked you before and you said you are getting ready to start making skimmers as a home business. Thanks for reminding me. I've only asked two people, and the other guy never responded. Regardless, I don't care if it's old or not. It's very pertinent because the skimmer business has paid PR, marketing, and promotion people, as well as paid shill posters, and paid product users. Any by "payment" I also mean free product. Turf scrubbers have none of that.
So, let me ask YOU. What Turf manufacturer/distributor/retailer do YOU work for?
Myself. Except I'm not a manufacturer, and I'm not paid.
Salad:
why haven't you contributed to ANY other threads?
I try to only contribute with what I have first-hand experience with, and even then, only if it has enough impact to warrant my time on it. And I think most people would agree that you should only advise others if you can do it correctly yourself. Beside, running three simultaneous real-time experiments, as well as designing and installing an acrylic version, and replying to folks who are trying to build their own, takes time.