Where can purchase a good inexpensive Calcium Reactor

CMDRAPER

New member
Where can you find a good inexpensive calcium reactor? how does it work? how much should you expect to pay? i need one for a 100 gal tank.
 
aquaticsystemsdesign.com

I ordered mine from there and everyone I talked to loves it.
It's alot cheaper then most of them out there. Only bad thing is it takes about 3 weeks so if you plan to order one, do it quick. I waited and now I find out he is booked solid.

I've looked and you won't find a quality one at his price. In all reality, it's not like the stuff is expensive, it's just knowing what to do to make em.
 
Would a Nielson/kalk reactor work for you? They're generally a little cheaper ($200 complete)?
 
kalk reactor will cost you more in media in the long run. However it is cheaper for the product. IMO, I'd go with a calcium reactor first. I tried kalk and I went through it pretty quick. DIY 2 part mix was alot cheaper then kalk when you have alarge tank.
 
A calcium reactor uses carbon dioxide to dissolve the calcium product. You need to refill your carbon dioxide tank periodically, in addition to replenishing the media. Usually the equipment cost of a calcium reactor is substantially more than a kalk/nielson reactor, because you need to buy the reactor, the co2 tank, a regulator, bubble counter, and maybe more (not sure here).

A kalk/nielson reactor only needs to have kalk added to it periodically. It is essentially a reactor tube with a mixing device, either a power head or a stir bar. The powder sits on the bottom and the kalk saturated water is drained off the top and into your tank/sump.

I'd estimate that a calcium reactor will run you $350-450, while a kalk reactor is $200.

I'm not sure I agree that the cost of media for the kalk reactor will end up making that system cost more over time. The $150 minimum price difference can buy a lot of kalk.

From what I read here, the real difference is that a calcium reactor is generally capable of adding more calcium to your tank. So if you have a tank that is a calcium hog, the kalk reactor may not be able to keep up. Having said that, some people run both, and it seems like many people get a kalk reactor first, and then if/when their tank starts needing more calcium, they get a calcium reactor. This certainly seems to be the more prudent economic way to do it.
 
hmmm good point. it sounds like the ca reactor is for someone keeping a lot of calcuim demanding animals. i plan on keeping a few sps...i doubt my tank will be using that much ca.

thanks for the advice and the website...i can make a decision now.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6516879#post6516879 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by jay24k
kalk reactor will cost you more in media in the long run. However it is cheaper for the product. IMO, I'd go with a calcium reactor first. I tried kalk and I went through it pretty quick.
you might want to try pickling lime instead of kalk from aquarium stores/sources. e.g. mrs. wages

the comparison from aquarium kalk ($7.00/lb.) to pickling lime ($3.75/lb.) is very significant. i've been using mrs. wages for a couple of years now (buy a box). i know many reefers that opt for that instead of brandname kalk.

otoh, a calcium reactor can't be beat but it is a lotta $$$. :bling: hth
 

Similar threads

Back
Top