Feeding SPS

Neptune777

Premium Member
Does everyone feed their SPS (Acros, Monti's, etc)? If so what is the most recommended food?


I ask because the LFS says they do not need feeding and they get their food from the Light source.....
 
What about Phyto or Oyster Eggs? Is that what people feed their SPS's? Not sure if I follow what you mean by feed your fish and they will take care of the corals.....I feed Mysis for the most part (way too big for SPS).
 
I feed a mixtue of oyster eggs, rotifers, and fresh shrimp, clam and mussel all blended up in my girlfriends blender.:D

BTW I dont' think sps feed on phyto
 
Re: Feeding SPS

<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6991306#post6991306 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Neptune777
... I ask because the LFS says they do not need feeding and they get their food from the Light source.....
Symbiotic corals are mixotrophic. No symbiotic corals are fully autotrophic or heterotrophic ... they utilize both methods of feeding. Even so, the vast majority of SPS commonly kept are able to meet their energy budget requirements through autotrophy alone (feeding not required) ... although it is perhaps worth noting that feeding will allow an SPS greater flexibility in the way that it allocates its energy resources (potential to improve skeletogenesis and/or fluorescent pigmentation).

For more info on "energy budget" and scleratinian heterotrophy, Aquarium Corals. Selection, Husbandry, and Natural Selection(Borneman 2001) has some interesting stuff. The energy budget stuff is in the Zoxanthellae chapter (p. 50), and the heterotrophy stuff is in the Foods & Feeding chapter (p. 57).

You might also check out Borneman's Reef Foods articles in Reefkeeping Magazine.



<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6991538#post6991538 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Neptune777
... Not sure if I follow what you mean by feed your fish and they will take care of the corals... .
90% (+/-) of food that is eaten by a fish is not utilized, and is excreted as "processed waste" back into the water column where it is available to be utilized by corals. Liquid excreta can be absorbed into, and translocated within coral tissue. Fecal excreta can be directly ingested, or "indirectly" ingested (after heterotrophic bacteria have broken it down). This is an excellent strategy for "feeding corals", while keeping nutrient input into your ecosystem to a minimum.


<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6992753#post6992753 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by fishypets
... BTW I dont' think sps feed on phyto
Lots of data demonstrating that phytoplankton is ingested, but no data (yet) that such ingestion serves any meaningful nutritional benefit. However, there is lots of data demonstrating that the products resulting from the action(s) of heterotrophic bacteria on algal cells are utilized productively by SPS.


Remembering that The Law of Conservation of Matter is very operant in captive marine ecosystems ... feeding is not a "risk free" husbandry choice (i.e., potential for nutrient accumulation in the water column) ... here's a post that discusses feeding and how it might relate to the enrichment of food webs (LINK) extracted from a thread called Scleractinian Feeding Strategies in another cyberspace.


JMO ... HTH
:D
 
Last edited:
if the coral get enough food (rotifers or other plankton) they do not need their zooxanthellae to much. so,the coral become brighter because decrease the density of zoox. is this statement right or wrong ?
 
I don't directly feed my SPS. They get the majority of their energy from the lights (photosynthesis). I feed the fish and the fish poop and I assume this feeds the coral enough.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6994646#post6994646 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by jaefei
if the coral get enough food (rotifers or other plankton) they do not need their zooxanthellae to much. so,the coral become brighter because decrease the density of zoox. is this statement right or wrong ?

It sounds reasonable, but I believe that in fact the tanks with the best color usually have exceptionally nutrient-poor water.
 
I really dobt whether feeding corals with artificial planktonic like product e.g. cyclop-eeze will greatly benefit to sps. IMH, it seems to me that the coral polype does not directly digest what we feed since it is still in a form that is too big or too unnatural for corals to consume. However, when the nutrient was transformed or being digested by bacteria and other smaller biological organism. These organisms finally being digested by corals and eventually benefit to corals in the end. Is this understanding valid?
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6994646#post6994646 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by jaefei
if the coral get enough food (rotifers or other plankton) they do not need their zooxanthellae to much. so,the coral become brighter because decrease the density of zoox. is this statement right or wrong ?
This does have an "intuitive appeal", doesn't it? But, if all other things are equal ... a big "if" when it comes to reefkeeping ... then no.

Quite the contrary, at least when it comes to Stylophora pistillata. When Stylophora pistillata was fed brine shrimp nauplii (... that's a "particule" 400+ microns in size ...), it's zooxanthellae CSD ("Cell Specific Density") increased (in contrast to specimens which were not fed). This result was presented in:

Interactions between zooplankton feeding, photosynthesis and skeletal growth in the scleractinian coral Stylophora pistillata.
Fanny Houlbrèque, Eric Tambutté, Denis Allemand and Christine Ferrier-Pagès
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 1461-1469 (2004)
Full Article (html)


From the same article ...

Both host and algal symbionts respond quickly to food availability (Fitt, 2000). At the algal level, Dubinsky et al. (1990) as well as Titlyanov et al., (2000a,b, 2001) showed an enhancement of the areal pigmentation and zooxanthellae density in fed corals, leading to an increase in the areal photosynthesis. At the animal level, heterotrophy tends to increase the amount of tissue synthesis (Jacques and Pilson, 1980; Sebens and Johnson, 1991; Kim and Lasker, 1998). An enhancement in skeletal growth has also been observed, suggesting that corals allocate a high proportion of the energy brought by food to calcification processes (Jacques and Pilson, 1980; Witting, 1999; Ferrier-Pagès et al., 2003; Houlbrèque et al., 2003). Although it is well known that nutrients are continuously exchanged between the two partners (Muscatine, 1990), few studies have focused on the simultaneous effect of feeding on the algal and animal components (Witting, 1999; Ferrier-Pagès et al., 2003; Houlbrèque et al., 2003).
In other words ... when corals corals ingest and transport digested materials (if that's what we mean by "feeding"), photosynthesis, zooxanthellae CSD, and skeletogenesis are all increased. This effect is different than the effect(s) from the absorption of nutrients from the water column ... although they are very much related.


Pigmentation biosynthesis ... while closely related ... has an additional set of variables to consider beyond "feeding".


JMO ... HTH
:D
 
Back
Top