True and true. Basically there are three alternatives.
A) Rock on the bottom and sand around. This option buries part of the live rock which will have die off and create pockets for hydrogen sulphide. Besides the expense of live rock being buried and the diminished denitirfication, there is less area for sand dwelling and digging creatures like gobbies, pistol shrimp, serpent stars and such.
In this case the rock as a minimum has to be placed on pieces of tiles. Rock directly on glass or acrilic will only towch on three points that are usually sharp creating a very large pin pointed stress that can break tempered glass and acrylic.
B) Settign the Rock on the sand. This has the advantage of having more of the rock show but this will usually create a potentially unstable condition specially if the rock is piled up and the sand used is oolitic (which are round spherical grains) due to sand sifting and water flow. Sand digging and dwelling critters will speed up the process of sand sifting.
C) Use of a stan for the rock. Acrylic rods on flat supports, PVC pipes, PVC couplings will help prevent the negative situations encountered on A and B above although imply more work and $$.
The structure will provide improved support, prevent pin pointed stress, show more rock, allow for any kind of critter to live under the rock whose digging improve circulation under the rock bed.