Punchanello
Member
Hi all.
I'm a bit confused by all the threads I see where people are desperately seeking help with hair algae etc who have very low nitrates and phosphates. They are often recommended fluconazole or some other bottle based product.
I guess I'd like to understand if my understanding from the reading I've done is correct.
Algae is naturally occurring on reefs so the issue is an aesthetic one. We don't like it in the DT. Algae consumes inorganic nutrients and also employs photosynthesis. If you are reading close to zero phosphates and nitrates and still have a hair algae problem it's likely that it is consuming these nutrients before they register. If you can reduce the biomass of the the algae (and/or its capacity to absorb nutrients and photosynthesise) and introduce some other nutrient consuming life under excellent conditions (like a macro-algae refugium with a powerful light in the right spectrum) it can theoretically out-compete just about any algae.
Lots of reefers I have seen with old tanks who employ this method have had great success. As a new hobbyist, I'd like to understand why so many people struggle with algae issues. Is it new tanks? Is the theory above correct but the implementation difficult? Are there some algae that are just too tough to beat without chemical help?
I'm a bit confused by all the threads I see where people are desperately seeking help with hair algae etc who have very low nitrates and phosphates. They are often recommended fluconazole or some other bottle based product.
I guess I'd like to understand if my understanding from the reading I've done is correct.
Algae is naturally occurring on reefs so the issue is an aesthetic one. We don't like it in the DT. Algae consumes inorganic nutrients and also employs photosynthesis. If you are reading close to zero phosphates and nitrates and still have a hair algae problem it's likely that it is consuming these nutrients before they register. If you can reduce the biomass of the the algae (and/or its capacity to absorb nutrients and photosynthesise) and introduce some other nutrient consuming life under excellent conditions (like a macro-algae refugium with a powerful light in the right spectrum) it can theoretically out-compete just about any algae.
Lots of reefers I have seen with old tanks who employ this method have had great success. As a new hobbyist, I'd like to understand why so many people struggle with algae issues. Is it new tanks? Is the theory above correct but the implementation difficult? Are there some algae that are just too tough to beat without chemical help?
Last edited: