Here is a top down view of the sump I built for my 120. I like the Filter sock/skimmer->refugium->return pump configuration.
Regarding sump design, I've seen several sump designs where there is a small section that takes the overflow water, then rises up and goes to the filter sock section. I think this design defeats the purpose of the filter sock because detritus can end up in that small overflow section and never reach the filter sock.
Did you obtain the baffle parts and sock holders as a kit?
If so, where?
If there is any trapped detritus in the small section it could easily be vacuumed out with a wet/dry vacuum, so I would not be concerned about it. I still like feeding the water directly into the sock however.
Did you obtain the baffle parts and sock holders as a kit?
If so, where?
exactly the reason why it is a bad design.
I think the reason for this design is to muffle the sound of water splash or bubbles coming into the sump, as this section is usually completely enclosed. maybe for durso overflow, this will help, but is not needed for herbie.
The first generation eshopps sump feeds directly to the sock, and is partially enclosed to muffle any water splashing sound. I use this sump and durso and it muffles the water sound enough. The newer generation separated the drain to its own section, which can have detritus collect, defeating the purpose of the filter sock, at least partly.
feeding water directly to the sock is the right design, which is what you have.
Ive heard a lot of people say not to use socks as they just create more problems than they take out, any thoughts?
Aside from using a filter sock for a few hours during a water change I've never found the need to run one 24/7. Just as an example, I'd much rather have any food that goes over the falls keep making revolutions throughout the system until something can utilize it as opposed to just sitting in a sock rotting for days on end. Same goes for the clownfish fry that show up on a regular basis too. Some of my corals have a field day when this this happens and I would hate to deprive them of that.
When I really stir things up then I'll put that filter sock to good use, but until that time comes I just don't see the point.
Bulk Reef Supply just ran an experiment with filter socks and they were proven to reduce nitrates and phosphates when changed twice a week. There is a smaller benefit if you change them out weekly or every other week.
I don't really see how this applies to me being that I'm not having any problems with both Phosphates and Nitrates without using a filter sock, but I'd love to see the experiment if you can post it.
Btw, where are the Phosphates and Nitrates coming from in this experiment? Tap water, dry rock, overfeeding, overstocking etc? Couldn't you just nip some of these in the bud first? Better husbandry perhaps? A filter sock just doesn't sound like the go to approach when dealing with these things IMO.