Too many conflicting IDs

Rav-65

New member
Anyone to chip in their 2 cents... had too many conflicting IDs on this piece....

485761.JPG
 
It looks similar to my caroliniana. Is it a bali aquacultured piece? If so, it could be a caroliniana.
 
Yup... its a Bali Aquaculture piece... but I haven't seen many of such pieces around.... is it common?? Anyway, cant find any info on caroliniana... anyone else got any suggestions??
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7714921#post7714921 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by undertai
Post in here the guy from reefermadness has helped a lot of people with iding of corals. Also look at some of the older pages to see if it has been ided already.

http://reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=751667&perpage=25&pagenumber=14

The problem is, at this point, there aren't even clear documented differences in the species. Even scientists can't tell if they dont know the location the frag was collected. Add in the fact that flow can change morphology, and you have a situation where there is NO WAY to accurately ID an acroporid.

Scientists are at this point trying to decide whether there should be about 8 species of acropora, or 800. They can't tell whether things are unique, or just regional variations, or different growth forms of the same organism.

Reefermadness is good, but hes doing nothing more than guessing there.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7715621#post7715621 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Stoney Mahony
I disagree. For having been in the buisness, he knows his stuff.

I'm not saying he doesnt.

I'm saying that theres not a scientific consensus on what actually constitutes each species.

I went to a presentation by Rob Toonen, who works closely with Charles Delbeek, both doing reasearch in the area.

Delbeek at this point refuses to ID anything thats been kept in captivity. He also refuses to ID anything without knowing where the collection location is. The problem is, so much of species ID is based on growth patterns, and tanks completely change the growth patterns of corals.

Also, any time species can't be differentiated except by collection location, you've got two species that are about to be combined.
 
It is true all I am doing is guessing. But that is all that we can do. We can't say Acropora spp. all the time. We also can't give every coral that comes in a fancy name depending on who is growing it out. So we have to try and break down the differences between the species (or subspecies) the best we can. From the tens of thousands of corals that I see every month you can see the definite similarities between the species. I try to do the best I can and make an ID from the literature that I have access to (i.e Veron and a few others, Wallace, etc). Some are quite easy to diferentiate but others are very difficult because they have similarities with several other species. I do not have a PHD in coral identification, and I do not say that my ID's are definite. I always try to communicate that "I believe or I guess or this might be" so on and so forth. But I always do my research before I make a "guess". I am not sure they are educated "guesses" but I do give it my all.

I am not sure that this makes anything better but I thought I should voice my opinion on why I do it in the first place. :)

Chris @ RM

P.S. Rav-65 this looks to me like it might be A. caroliniana. They aren't all that common but they can be a very beautiful tabletop when they grow out.
 
Chris, I wasnt trying to take a shot at you or anything, just trying to illuminate people on the state of things. As far as IDs go, you're about as good as it CAN get.


Your stuff is gorgeous by the way. Unfortunately I lost most of the frags I had in the recent move :( Will be ordering stuff again most likely as soon as the tank gets back to stable
 
It is all true. You can only attempt to ID these corals. I agree that Chris probably is one of the best at identifying these corals. In all honesty, I don't even attempt it.
 
RichConley,

Oh no I didn't think you were ripping me in the least. I just wanted to clarify why I do what I do.

I agree with you completely in the sense that even the experts won't try in some cases to ID corals. Some Acropora can completely change due to higher or lower light, higher or lower water flow, etc... It is a crap shoot a lot of the time, but I have seen so many corals over the years that I start to see a lot of similarities that most folks might not notice. I am not a expert, but I do have a fat head and I always come on here to have the balloon deflated a bit :) . No I'm just kidding, but I just hate (I HATE) to call stuff sp. I feel like I have failed myself and all the years of schooling (Aquaculture, Mariculture and Ichthyology) that I have had.

I'm only here to Muddy the waters. :)

Chris @ RM

P.S. I hope to hear from you soon about those frags. Moves and Vacations suck for Reefers. If you ever are going to lose something it always happens during one or both of those endeavors.
 
Wentreefgirl,

Yes I agree with Maximus as well.... :)

P.S. Rav-65 this looks to me like it might be A. caroliniana. They aren't all that common but they can be a very beautiful tabletop when they grow out.
 
Thanks to you and Veron im getting good at this game, <img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v298/wentreefgirl/Blinkies%20and%20siggies/grinhuge.gif">
 
If it grows into a bushy style or caesptiose(sp) it may fall closely to a a. Lokani which personally is what I think that it is. but they are extremely close to caroliniana.

Brian
 
Hi Chris...

appreciate the ID!! I know it can be a real strain to ID some of these species...

Thanks to everyone for your "guess" :D But since Chris ID-ed it as a Caroliniana, it's gonna be a Coraliniana to me until someone can come up with something more concrete!! :)

Cheers!
 
Back
Top