Yeah, I dunno. I just think it would be trickier with two channels to the sump (lets call the direct line A and the display->cryptic-> sump is line B), which could be thought through.You have to make sure that the flow to your sump, especially when the return pump is off, is much faster through A than it is B or else you end up with the cryptic tank overflowing.
Also, you now have less wiggle room for sump holding capacity.
I really think there are 3 better ways of doing this.
1) I don't see why you can't split your return and have two independent instead of interdependent drain lines (I do this).
2) Or, to enhance sump holding capacity, run the cryptic tank parallel with the sump (i.e. run two sumps, one cryptic)
3) Run all the tanks in series. If you want to slow flow in the cryptic area, then dump from DT to crypto to sump. In the crypto put your return next to the drain in a baffled-off area. That will direct most flow through the tank quickly and the main portion of the crypto will be a low flow pool.