150 or 250?

reefngeek

reefngeek

New member
Im getting a 24inx24inx16in(lwh) rimless square tank and was wondering on suggestions for a ballast and reflector. On my current tank I have T5s so im new to MHs and am unsure if i should get a 150 watt ballast and reflector or a 250 ballast and reflector. Any suggestions?
 
You can do either, I run a single 150 on a 40x40x17and just took some par readings earlier this week...the right bulb, ballast and reflector combination can do wonders.
 
I have a 30x30x12 frag tank and run dual 250 watt Phoenix bulbs over it. However, on a 24"x24" tank, a single bulb will work just fine.
 
I'm going to be running 2 150 watt vipers [ as soon as my rock cooks] on my 40 gallon breeder I would think 250 watt might be a little strong
 
at 16"tall i'd use a 150. i have the same footprint, only in a cube. my 250 serves me perfectly, but it gets pretty hot.
 
I have a 24"x24"x18" deep tank and I run a 250w DE MH. It seems to be enough light for softies, zoas and LPS, but I sometimes wonder if it isn't enough for my SPS. I run a pheonix 14k DE w/ ARO electronic ballast and a simple parabolic reflector, just for reference.
 
I was just looking at the Lumatek dimmable, multi-wattage ballast in marine depots new catalog before I saw your thread. This would give you some options because you can use it for either 150w or 250w. I've never used them so I dont know if they're any good but something to consider.
 
I used to run a single 150 on my 24x24x12 frag tank and got horrible PAR readings. 6" down in the center, I was barely in the 200s. I was using a Magnetic ballast, Phoenix bulb, and a lumen max 3 reflector.
My vote would be for the 250
 
Reef -n- Geek,

The Lumen Bright mini, would give you a very nice 24" x 24" foot print. Run it @ 250 w/ Radium bulb, will be plenty of light for SPS in only 18" of depth, and you will not need any other supplement.
 
solitude127 said:
I used to run a single 150 on my 24x24x12 frag tank and got horrible PAR readings. 6" down in the center, I was barely in the 200s. I was using a Magnetic ballast, Phoenix bulb, and a lumen max 3 reflector.
My vote would be for the 250
Click to expand...

Mike...something had to be wrong with the setup. I just tested the par on my 150 Radiums, Aqua Medic Cube HQI Ballast and a LAIII Mini, the results were greatly different than you had. I tested two bulbs, the 20K Radium, and an old 10K XDE, in the pic below, the fist number is the Radium and the second number the XDE 10K, if there is only one number, it is the Radium. The pic is poor, I had to over expose it a little to get the back to show up for the text, my old camera isn't up to the task.

40x40x17" Pentagon, rock arranged in a 24-30" cove. Most corals reside around the perimeter of the cove. Most of the corals are 18-20" in height from the bulb.

Par at the glass shield was 1200 for the Radium and 2200 for the 10K
Par at the water surface, 9" from the bulb, Radium at 780 and the 10K at 1900. The purple Milli is directly under the bulb.

150Par.jpg

.
.
.
.




To the OP, I would go with 250 watters, it leaves you with more options for tank upgrades in the future. I already have a 250 setup but in my case, I don't think I am going to need more PAR than my setup is giving me. Keep in mind that the ballast, bulb and reflector have a huge impact on what reaches the tank and how.
.
.
.
 
Wineman is that pendent DE or SE?? Are radiums good bulbs? Any suggestions on a ballast to go with that pendent?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
Fluval Reef 4.0 LED Nano Power Level for 15G?
Replies
3
Views
263
kingyking888
K
S
Help with Overflow Design Issue
Replies
0
Views
186
SFMAquariums
S
E
Red Sea weir overflow
Replies
9
Views
363
griss
griss
T
Reef octopus Varios 4 0-10V connection to Hydros controllers
Replies
2
Views
265
tmann51
T
C
Can’t keep overflow box balanced
Replies
2
Views
184
Cruzersmith
C
Back
Top