My Two Cents
My Two Cents
Hi There,
So I had a buddy of mine recently had a terrible experience with the CW scrubber that nearly burnt his house down. The main issue, and I hope that CW addresses this, is that it leaks from the sides because the mesh screen is too wide for the unit, the GPH needed to power the unit is a lot higher because they use a slotted screen, and there is nothing that seals the sides.
So when the screen grows algae(And you will because all scrubbers will grow a crap ton of it), the algae will clog up the side of the slot and cause water to spill out :-/. There is no bulkhead to prevent the leak --- it's just all bad. If you don't believe me, you need to check out his podcast where he breaks down what happened:
https://reefnewsnetwork.com/keeprollin/
See around the 52:15 mark.
Of the two of them, this leak issue alone makes the 302 Aquatics model the way to go if you are comparing them. I do think that Turbo's model is the top of the line when it comes to scrubbers, but his units are very expensive in comparison so it's not really apples to oranges.
The $40 light blockers that CW sells are also a bit silly. They should just put vinyl tape or paint the clear acrylic with Krylon and that would fix the light bleed issue.
There is also a variant I see sold here which has a round acrylic corners. It's actually a bit cheaper than the CW models.
https://aquariumstoredepot.com/products/302-aquatics-das-algae-turf-scrubbers
The rain scrubbers are no joke as well. The Rain has the smallest footprint if you are short on space and I think one of their models comes with the stand now. They all really have their fit for your needs, but until CW clears up that leak issue I would stay away from them. I'm sure they will figure it out soon.
I also agree on BRS pitching grimmicks lately. There was a recent post on their Q&A for the CW scrubbers where their admin said that ATS cannot grow pods. You gotta be kidding me!
And I Quote:
Hey there,
That's a great question! While algae turf scrubbers may not be specifically called out as part of the Triton method, they serve a more or less identical goal of controlling dissolved organic wastes through the use of algae to uptake these by-products. I can't see any reason running the Triton method would prevent you from using one of these.
Of course, you wouldn't get the other benefits of a refugium such as a copepod sanctuary, but when it comes to keeping organics very low, these are a great solution! ...
I would be ****ed at that quote if I was CW. ATS have been known for growing pods for ages :headwally:
Video proof below

:
https://youtu.be/0zjbKiZF2dc