jbfloor
Member
I have been using the Tunze 7096 controller with two 6095 pumps for a week now and noticed that the unit could be made to be a lot more flexible with just a couple of minor tweaks to the firmware.
Here is my setup:
The green arrows indicate the two 6095 pumps at opposite ends of the tank. My goal is to recreate the rolling waves in a shallow reef, reversing the water flow every 5-10 seconds or so. As far as I can tell this is not possible with the 7096, which is very disappointing.
Here are the problems:
1) Pulse mode & night mode are incompatible:
This would be the normal way to set up the type of flow I am trying to achieve. However, night-mode was developed to always fall back to 'power 1' for both units, which means that pump 2 will run at 70% all night. This makes the night mode useless. It would be so much better if night mode either always takes the lower of the two power modes, in this case 30% for both pumps, or if you, as a user, can set the power level for night mode separately.
2) Interval mode is too slow
Trying to be clever, I tried to use interval mode instead. Unfortunately, again the unnecessary inflexibility of the unit stood in my way. The above settings allow for night-mode to function normally, but only allows one minute between switches. If interval time could only be in seconds, this all would have been solved.
3) Wavecontroller is start/stop
I tried the wavecontroller, but it seems to be an all-or-nothing mode. Also, it maxes out at 2.5 seconds, which is too short. If I could use the power levels for socket 3 and 4 and the wave length would not have been limited, I could have achieved my goal.. Alas, again I am thwarted by artificial limits.
None of these changes require real changes to the UI or major rewrites of the firmware. The 7096 would be so much better if some of these restrictions were removed and the user was allowed to be creative.
Finally, a question: What does 'ramp' mean? I understand it ramps the pump up or down, but what is the difference between setting it to 0.1 and 2.4 (the max in pulse mode). If using 2.4, does it mean it will take 2.4 seconds to ramp up?
PS. I am an embedded software engineer, so you can get as technical as you want in your answers. Thanks.
Here is my setup:
![allflow_zps20a72beb.jpg](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fi1280.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa490%2Fjbfloor%2Fallflow_zps20a72beb.jpg&hash=786f26a3a902395908ba0a22c6f98f02)
The green arrows indicate the two 6095 pumps at opposite ends of the tank. My goal is to recreate the rolling waves in a shallow reef, reversing the water flow every 5-10 seconds or so. As far as I can tell this is not possible with the 7096, which is very disappointing.
Here are the problems:
1) Pulse mode & night mode are incompatible:
![7096.png](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fi1280.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa490%2Fjbfloor%2F7096.png&hash=21633bed4e906ca6f86b9cc7d065634c)
This would be the normal way to set up the type of flow I am trying to achieve. However, night-mode was developed to always fall back to 'power 1' for both units, which means that pump 2 will run at 70% all night. This makes the night mode useless. It would be so much better if night mode either always takes the lower of the two power modes, in this case 30% for both pumps, or if you, as a user, can set the power level for night mode separately.
2) Interval mode is too slow
![7096b.png](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fi1280.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa490%2Fjbfloor%2F7096b.png&hash=7e7869d4529514175db8bb5d0bbe1692)
Trying to be clever, I tried to use interval mode instead. Unfortunately, again the unnecessary inflexibility of the unit stood in my way. The above settings allow for night-mode to function normally, but only allows one minute between switches. If interval time could only be in seconds, this all would have been solved.
3) Wavecontroller is start/stop
I tried the wavecontroller, but it seems to be an all-or-nothing mode. Also, it maxes out at 2.5 seconds, which is too short. If I could use the power levels for socket 3 and 4 and the wave length would not have been limited, I could have achieved my goal.. Alas, again I am thwarted by artificial limits.
None of these changes require real changes to the UI or major rewrites of the firmware. The 7096 would be so much better if some of these restrictions were removed and the user was allowed to be creative.
Finally, a question: What does 'ramp' mean? I understand it ramps the pump up or down, but what is the difference between setting it to 0.1 and 2.4 (the max in pulse mode). If using 2.4, does it mean it will take 2.4 seconds to ramp up?
PS. I am an embedded software engineer, so you can get as technical as you want in your answers. Thanks.