2) That the results of this test, without documentation of its sourcewater values, provides us with a good comparative gauge of the tested product's values, but cannot be relied upon for absolute values.
I have confidence that Billy's source fresh water is pure and is not showing up in the values, but I'll leave it to him to describe it.
Still waiting on this one:
"And what about phosphates and silicates? Their importance merit the attention of many commercial purveyors of salt mixes (read the labels- Phosphate and Silicate free!...) but seems to have eluded the scrutiny of almost all the contributors to this thread..."
Well?...
In that sense, I agree, and would expand the concern to many more things than we can test. there is so much more to a salt mix than calcium, alkalinity and magnesium. In fact, those are the ones that are easiest to measure and correct. Other issues are far more complicated. Chloride to sulfate ratios, trace metals, and many other attributes. I personally would not and do not select a salt mix based on calcium, alkalinity, and magnesium. I think this information is very useful to a lot of people, but IMO, should not be the sole, or even the primary basis of salt mix selection.
BUT, the reason I have never been keen on spending a lot of time and money testing salt mixes for these other attributes is that manufacturers change their recipes and raw material suppliers frequently and without notice. The data can be obsolete even before it is posted. For example, I've been told by one of the biggest names on Billy's list that they recently adjusted their levels of some things in his test substantially.
I have confidence that Billy's source fresh water is pure and is not showing up in the values, but I'll leave it to him to describe it.
Still waiting on this one:
"And what about phosphates and silicates? Their importance merit the attention of many commercial purveyors of salt mixes (read the labels- Phosphate and Silicate free!...) but seems to have eluded the scrutiny of almost all the contributors to this thread..."
Well?...
In that sense, I agree, and would expand the concern to many more things than we can test. there is so much more to a salt mix than calcium, alkalinity and magnesium. In fact, those are the ones that are easiest to measure and correct. Other issues are far more complicated. Chloride to sulfate ratios, trace metals, and many other attributes. I personally would not and do not select a salt mix based on calcium, alkalinity, and magnesium. I think this information is very useful to a lot of people, but IMO, should not be the sole, or even the primary basis of salt mix selection.
BUT, the reason I have never been keen on spending a lot of time and money testing salt mixes for these other attributes is that manufacturers change their recipes and raw material suppliers frequently and without notice. The data can be obsolete even before it is posted. For example, I've been told by one of the biggest names on Billy's list that they recently adjusted their levels of some things in his test substantially.