_shorty_
New member
ATS (algae turf scrubbers) vs UAS (up-flow algae scrubber)
In practice - which do you prefer, and why?
Each (to my understanding) seems to have its bennifets. Maybe we could list bennifets and draw-backs of each for those who are deciding how to construct and implement thier own algae scrubbers?
UAS Bennifets:
* don't have to deal with the drasted slotted pipe.
* Potentially design with easy-to-remove screen (without turning off water flow)
* I've heard that it yields slightly better growth... ??
UAS DrawBacks:
* Not as simple to light on both sides of the screen (although you can still do given a little enginuity - and maybe some acrylic work)
* My guess is that you need more intensity of light through the larger thickness of water? (which could also make for more compact designs as you can probably move your CFL bulbs closer to the actual screen)
ATS Bennifets:
* time tested - it's proven itself in nutrient removal of any size system given the correct set-up
* Good flow of water with more contact on the algae itself.
* easier to light from both sides
ATS DrawBacks:
* that DANG slotted pipe :mad2: (I personally don't like the slotted pipe because of my first design. It works great, but I engineered a nice acrylic box (above tank) with Rigid PVC. It is a definite pain to get the screen in and out of the slot when time to clean the screen. My own design, my own fault...
One major question in my mind is to the effectiveness of the UAS as far as actual nutrient removal goes. Everyone talks about how to effectively grow the green hair algae which is obviously important, but what about the effectiveness of nutrient removal itself which is the ultimate goal after all...? Sure it grows algae well, but what about water displacement over the algae itself? Maybe I'm not seeing the whole picture (of nutrient equilization throughout the water column maybe) but it seems that there is an important piece of the puzzle to have good water movement over the algae in order to have as much water in contact with the algae as possible in order to remove those nutrients from the water column... Is that not an issue with the UAS?
In practice - which do you prefer, and why?
Each (to my understanding) seems to have its bennifets. Maybe we could list bennifets and draw-backs of each for those who are deciding how to construct and implement thier own algae scrubbers?
UAS Bennifets:
* don't have to deal with the drasted slotted pipe.
* Potentially design with easy-to-remove screen (without turning off water flow)
* I've heard that it yields slightly better growth... ??
UAS DrawBacks:
* Not as simple to light on both sides of the screen (although you can still do given a little enginuity - and maybe some acrylic work)
* My guess is that you need more intensity of light through the larger thickness of water? (which could also make for more compact designs as you can probably move your CFL bulbs closer to the actual screen)
ATS Bennifets:
* time tested - it's proven itself in nutrient removal of any size system given the correct set-up
* Good flow of water with more contact on the algae itself.
* easier to light from both sides
ATS DrawBacks:
* that DANG slotted pipe :mad2: (I personally don't like the slotted pipe because of my first design. It works great, but I engineered a nice acrylic box (above tank) with Rigid PVC. It is a definite pain to get the screen in and out of the slot when time to clean the screen. My own design, my own fault...
One major question in my mind is to the effectiveness of the UAS as far as actual nutrient removal goes. Everyone talks about how to effectively grow the green hair algae which is obviously important, but what about the effectiveness of nutrient removal itself which is the ultimate goal after all...? Sure it grows algae well, but what about water displacement over the algae itself? Maybe I'm not seeing the whole picture (of nutrient equilization throughout the water column maybe) but it seems that there is an important piece of the puzzle to have good water movement over the algae in order to have as much water in contact with the algae as possible in order to remove those nutrients from the water column... Is that not an issue with the UAS?