BigJay
New member
I read an article called "All herbivores are not created equal" in the recent TFH magazine. At the heart of the article was a field study on what kind of fish were eating which algae on a reef. Most of the common algae eating fish (rabbits, tangs) would barely touch large algal growths (sargassum in this case). However, these fish would feast on smaller tufts of the same algae with great gusto. It was actually a species of batfish that did significant damage to larger growths. Apparently some algae eating fish are useful at controlling algae on the reef when there isn't much of it, but useless at turning around a reef already taken over by algae (due to overfishing, run off, etc).
Anyways, my question is does this have any relation to what algae fish will eat in the aquarium? I've noticed that pygmy angels are only interested in the film-type algae, they leave the longer hair algae alone for the most part. They won't eat the clip nori, I surmise because it's too big. So I added less nori to the tank, so that less than 1/4" was exposed past the clip. Not surprisingly, they actually ate most of it where as before they wouldn't go near it.
I hope I brought up an interesting topic, sorry if I bored anyone.
Anyways, my question is does this have any relation to what algae fish will eat in the aquarium? I've noticed that pygmy angels are only interested in the film-type algae, they leave the longer hair algae alone for the most part. They won't eat the clip nori, I surmise because it's too big. So I added less nori to the tank, so that less than 1/4" was exposed past the clip. Not surprisingly, they actually ate most of it where as before they wouldn't go near it.
I hope I brought up an interesting topic, sorry if I bored anyone.