MedRed
Active member
Why do aquarium magazines not perform relevant product comparisons? Car magazines pit minivans against each other. PC magazines put up the latest processors and GPUs. I have to wonder if they are afraid of losing advertising dollars from unfavorable reviews.
Why not put the accuracy of test kits against each other? How about the effectiveness of chemipure vs regular activated carbon? Par values of different lighting fixtures? Noise levels in decibels of various pumps, heat output, as well as their true gph? The effectiveness of Bio Spira vs Superbac vs Microbacter7? The true concentrations of the various magnesium, strontium, etc. additives? Actual flow rates for powerheads? Salt roundups?
This list goes on and on. These would be the things that would make Aquarium publications relevant. If I'm ranting? I apologize. Maybe these things are out there, and I just miss them. There are so many claims in this hobby that aren't backed up. It'd be nice if our publications worked hard to not only review products... but to compare them.
Why not put the accuracy of test kits against each other? How about the effectiveness of chemipure vs regular activated carbon? Par values of different lighting fixtures? Noise levels in decibels of various pumps, heat output, as well as their true gph? The effectiveness of Bio Spira vs Superbac vs Microbacter7? The true concentrations of the various magnesium, strontium, etc. additives? Actual flow rates for powerheads? Salt roundups?
This list goes on and on. These would be the things that would make Aquarium publications relevant. If I'm ranting? I apologize. Maybe these things are out there, and I just miss them. There are so many claims in this hobby that aren't backed up. It'd be nice if our publications worked hard to not only review products... but to compare them.