<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=15280746#post15280746 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Superstretch18
I've run both barebottom and with sand and I don't think I would ever run another tank without sand.
Aesthetics is a big part of it, but you also limit the biodiversity in the main tank. Granted, if you are running a fuge, you are going to at least be cultivating it elsewhere. But for me, personally, I find the life that comes with a live sand bed to be one of the most interesting parts of owning a tank. That's really just my personal preference though...
I would question whether having a fuge on a low nutrient sps tank is going to be beneficial. The extremely low nutrient levels are going to make cultivating macro harder. Also, keeping sand out of the main tank, just to create a nutrient sink in the fuge's dsb is going to be counter productive. If the macro winds up growing well, it's likely because the DSB is providing nutrients, which if that is the case, you might as well have sand in the main tank.
This is all my internal thought process, so I'm not shooting down your plans, by any means. Just if I was doing a low nutrient bare-bottom system, I'd go with the biggest skimmer I could afford/fit, kill the fuge and possibly consider dosing vodka...
Thank you man! This is the stuff I need to hear!