guserto4
Member
I am considering an 'atypical' filtration design and am curious about benthic zones and agitated zones in respect to live rock and quality / quantity of filtration. Is there anything to gain by focusing on one, the other, or both in a trough style filtration sump? I want to try and rely on ATS, a Xenia fug & LR (and GAC & GFO and a skimmer in place but operating as backup).
I'm working on dividing up an 82x20x14" 90g tank into two long troughs with a 20g Xenia refugium partitioned on one end that will take in one trough and turn out the other. Im planning on something like 1000gph flow or an average flow rate of 0.67" / 1 second within each trough. Potential exposure distance is 110-120", up to 3 minutes contact time. ATS will be fed from the DT prior to this tank. The skimmer, GAC & GFO will probably locate near the end of this process.
SO is there a benefit to an agitation zone or should I just let this lazy river move on through? Is LR rubble best, or should I try mud / sand, etc.?
I'm working on dividing up an 82x20x14" 90g tank into two long troughs with a 20g Xenia refugium partitioned on one end that will take in one trough and turn out the other. Im planning on something like 1000gph flow or an average flow rate of 0.67" / 1 second within each trough. Potential exposure distance is 110-120", up to 3 minutes contact time. ATS will be fed from the DT prior to this tank. The skimmer, GAC & GFO will probably locate near the end of this process.
SO is there a benefit to an agitation zone or should I just let this lazy river move on through? Is LR rubble best, or should I try mud / sand, etc.?