i dont know why people bash the biocube skimmer so much? obviously there are better skimmers out there, but he BC skimmer works just fine. i wouldnt pour back into my tank what it pulls in 2 days!
sorry lyfey, i missed your post.
i only scraped the paint off of chamber number 2, but i scraped all of chamber 2, not just part of it. the reason for scraping all of it is because i like to reposistion my light every once in a while. there was no real science when adding my fuge, i just threw the live rock rubble into the bottom of the fuge, and then put the cheato on top of it. my light literally touches the glass so the light is concentrated only in 1/3 of the fuge at a time. thats why i like to be able to move the light. as the cheato at the bottom of the fuge grows, it grows into the only direction that it can go, which is up. as the top of the cheato grows, i slowly move the light up the back of the refugium with it. eventually over the course of a few months the cheato reaches the top of the fuge and i harvest half of it and move the light back down.
the benefit of a fuge in a nano tank compared to a larger tank is the same in my opinion. most people will tell you that a fuge in a nano is less important because the volume of water in a nano is less and that a water change is easier and goes further in the way of benefit since its a smaller volume of water. personally i think its all relative. a 15% change is a 15% change no matter what the tanks size. the reason I (how do you make the "I" lean as to put emphasis on it?) think the fuge is of the same value in the nano is because ive seen the value of mine in action. when i first set up my tank i didnt have the fuge, and i had quite few patches of nuisance hair algae growing in random parts of the display. nothing helped to relieve the problem untill i added the fuge. literally within days of adding the fuge i watched every patch of hair algae turn white and withered away untill there was none left. and it happend very, very quikly, within the matter of a week or so. then, when i harvest my cheato and reduce the size of the ball by 90% the hair algae comes back briefly untill the cheato gets back into its growth pattern, then the hair algae dissappears again.
so for me, the benefits of a fuge in the nano is a succsess by trial which is where i've developed my opinion for a fuge. for some people the results of success, or lack there of, may vary depending on the technique, type of fuge and bio load that they're dealing with. maybe i just got lucky???
