So I dont know how many watched this video but I did their experiment and had some concerns. Its based on people that have problems getting their ALK to rise. They say its bc they overdose, and bc they overdosed the ALK doesnt absorb into the water and thats why they dont see a bump in their levels, to paraphrase. They say their BRS160 tank only consumes around 200ml of ALK solution a day and it would be considered a low to moderately stocked tank. They also say Calc and Alk are usually dosed in a 1:1 ratio. Also, that if your tank is dosing more than the BRS160 and does not have as many stocked corals, that you should look into whether youre overdosing your solutions or not. They way to do this is to stop dosing for 4 days straight, dose each day an amount to bring the levels back up and hammer down the pattern.
I dont have issues with Alk not rising like mentioned in the video. However, I have a 90 gallon tank compared to their 160. I have probably half as many (if that) corals as they do, but still SPS dominated. I do though still dose just over 200ml a day of ALK in my tank, and I also only dose roughly 150ml of Calcium daily in my tank. The kicker is I also dose kalk in my ATO, so really, without that my consumption would be even higher
So I decided to check and see if I might be overdosing at all and Im actually pretty spot on for the most part, and I actually need to dose more if the numbers hold up. Right now Im dosing for 1.5dkh loss in a day, today was 1.7.
SO I guess the point of all this is I wanted to ask why my tank, even though almost half the size, and half the amount of corals, is consuming just as much as their BRS160 tank that they would regard as light to moderately stocked.
Also, I was always under the impression that ALK and Calcium consumption wasnt a 1:1 ratio. I had always read that about half as much calcium was consumed as ALK usually, but theyre saying otherwise.
I know that was a lot, does anyone have any thoughts on this?
I dont have issues with Alk not rising like mentioned in the video. However, I have a 90 gallon tank compared to their 160. I have probably half as many (if that) corals as they do, but still SPS dominated. I do though still dose just over 200ml a day of ALK in my tank, and I also only dose roughly 150ml of Calcium daily in my tank. The kicker is I also dose kalk in my ATO, so really, without that my consumption would be even higher
So I decided to check and see if I might be overdosing at all and Im actually pretty spot on for the most part, and I actually need to dose more if the numbers hold up. Right now Im dosing for 1.5dkh loss in a day, today was 1.7.
SO I guess the point of all this is I wanted to ask why my tank, even though almost half the size, and half the amount of corals, is consuming just as much as their BRS160 tank that they would regard as light to moderately stocked.
Also, I was always under the impression that ALK and Calcium consumption wasnt a 1:1 ratio. I had always read that about half as much calcium was consumed as ALK usually, but theyre saying otherwise.
I know that was a lot, does anyone have any thoughts on this?