<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=13882721#post13882721 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by MJI
I have to say, i didn't do much detailed scrutiny, so there could well have been smaller ones.
The numbers are definitely small. compared to others like E quad, and H mag.
Unfortunately, I have to confess as to not seeing a gigantea on a dive yet. I would very much like to.
Here's a pic of a mertens from one of my dives:
![]()
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=13884138#post13884138 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by garygb
So Shutiny, you feel Merten's is ultimately a better bet for captivity than haddoni? I've always heard they are more demanding. Maybe that is only true for gigantea. They certainly are nice looking anemones there in that pic. I thrilled you are having success fragging them. It's exciting how Merten's and H. magnificas are being successfully fragged. Cutting edge stuff, pardon the pun;-)
Christina, that's a beauty. Is that a Clarkii? I've read that they become melanistic in Merten's. If that is Clarkii, it certainly has.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=13890885#post13890885 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by garygb
It's looking good. Have you tried to feed it yet?
thanks for posting your findings. i had a thread going on another site detailing the depth range of H. magnifica and now ive more info on another anemone of interest. not as though i expect to find one at my lfs any time soon (wishfull thinking), still its good to know more. btw i knew S. haddoni can be found in shallow water but didnt know they are sometimes exposed at low tide. thanks again;-)<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=13876427#post13876427 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by shutiny
this was a wild study that I wanted to do in the natural environment...
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=13895228#post13895228 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by garygb
Thank you very much for the pics. It will be interesting to see if it will grow more quickly once it begins to take food. I imagine it will, but time will tell. Thanks for the work you do with anemones. You're one of the pioneers in captive breeding of anemones. Hopefully 10 years from now it will be old news and a clear protocol for fragging the different host anemone species will exist, but for now it's trial-and-error.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=13895783#post13895783 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by marc price
thanks for posting your findings. i had a thread going on another site detailing the depth range of H. magnifica and now ive more info on another anemone of interest. not as though i expect to find one at my lfs any time soon (wishfull thinking), still its good to know more. btw i knew S. haddoni can be found in shallow water but didnt know they are sometimes exposed at low tide. thanks again;-)
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=13896885#post13896885 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by garygb
Thank you Shutiny. Mine split two years ago, November and they haven't shown any interest in splitting since. Unlike you, Flighty and Phender, I'm too chicken to even think about cutting one in half;-) Also, I only have three relatively small tanks, so I don't exactly have the facilities to carry off a fragging operation.
As an aside, do you have any magnificas under T-5s? I have two under MH (Colorvue 10000K) and two mags under T-5s. All are healthy and eat well and all that, but I'm thinking the ones under the MH look more like the pics of mags in the ocean. Just curious if you have tried T-5s w/ magnifica. As far as RBTAs, I think they love T-5s just as much as MH, maybe more. But I'm not convinced H. magnifica do. Whatever the case, the two under the T-5s are going to have to deal with it, I spent too much on the T-5s to go back to MH. Actually, if they seemed to be failing, I would probably bite the bullet and get a MH fixture. But fortunately, they are growing and eating and stationary and all that. The tentacles just look a little different than the "wild" magnifica pics. If you have any thoughts on the subject, I'd love to hear them.