I am not technical so I am asking some newbie questions. I have a chiller and I think the part that cost a lot of $$$ is running the compressor.
So am I correct that after you layout the $$$ for the parts and installation, the only "operating cost" will be the cost of the water pump running? Also, with your layout, there wont' be a compressor in your setup.
Again, not knowledgeable in this area. Just trying to understand what part of the chiller that makes it expensive to run, versus having nature chill the water.
Also, I do understand that by not having the water actually be exchanged, that it won't be as efficient.
Is there anyone, on the Web that has done this kind of thing and can you get some kind of calculator to actually figure out how much coil you will need to place in the sump, to keep the water cold?
It just seems like by not actually cooling the water itself and exchanging it, that there probably is a lot of "inefficiency". I understand that you know this. Is there a way to measure the differences?
So am I correct that after you layout the $$$ for the parts and installation, the only "operating cost" will be the cost of the water pump running? Also, with your layout, there wont' be a compressor in your setup.
Again, not knowledgeable in this area. Just trying to understand what part of the chiller that makes it expensive to run, versus having nature chill the water.
Also, I do understand that by not having the water actually be exchanged, that it won't be as efficient.
Is there anyone, on the Web that has done this kind of thing and can you get some kind of calculator to actually figure out how much coil you will need to place in the sump, to keep the water cold?
It just seems like by not actually cooling the water itself and exchanging it, that there probably is a lot of "inefficiency". I understand that you know this. Is there a way to measure the differences?