DSB Sticky -- Calling All Newbies

Whys

New member
Okay, looking to add a Deep Sand Bed article to the stickys section at the top of this forum. Myself and others have been working on this one in the Advanced Topics forum. Wrought from brimstone, here it is. But this article is for newbies, so I want to get some final feedback from all of you before submitting it to WaterKeeper.

This article has a fairly narrow focus and should be largely complete, so many suggestions will likely fall outside the intended scope, but don't hesitate to throw your thoughts out there, what ever they are. Just don't be disappointed if they don't get included.

I thank you in advance for your peer reviews. :)

----------------------------------------

Deep Sand Bed -- Anatomy & Terminology

A deep sand bed, or DSB for short, can be a useful addition to a saltwater aquarium, refugium, or even a remote bin. Tho based on a remarkably simple idea, DSB discussions can become enormously complex. The purpose of this article is to offer a generalized understanding of the core concepts and specific terminology. This is by no means the final word on the DSB, nor does it advocate anything more than educating the reader, but it can also serve as a guide to a more serious investigation.

There are several potential benefits and possible drawbacks to having a DSB. Most often their purpose is for nitrate reduction, so that is this article's focus, but that is not their only purpose, nor is a DSB the only means for achieving that goal. Not everyone uses a DSB and many have tried them with poor results. Some do use a DSB and have reported good results for a decade or more. There is substantial disagreement as to why some succeed and others fail. Over the years, some general rules of thumb have evolved, but they should not be mistaken for definitive science. It is up to the reader to reach their own conclusions.

To better understand the anatomy of a deep sand bed, let us first look at a shallow sand bed, or SSB for short.

SSB.jpg


- Oxic: oxygenated.
- Aerobic: requires oxygen to function.
- Nitrifying: converts ammonia into nitrate.


In all aquariums, decomposition is largely performed by bacteria, but the process can be facilitated by the presence of a "clean up crew", or CUC for short. Detritus (waste) and other organic matter is first eaten by the CUC of crabs, stars, hermits, and snails. The smaller particulates they produce are then further broken down by copepods, other benthic organisms, and worms. The remaining dissolved organics are then converted by the "nitrifying" bacteria, from ammonia (toxic), to nitrite (less toxic), to nitrate (least toxic). All of this takes place within a layer of sand oxygenated by moving water, termed oxic, and the bacteria there require oxygen to function, termed aerobic. In a shallow sand bed this is where the process ends. The nitrate simply accumulates in the water column to be removed by ritual water change.

In a deep sand bed, there are another type of bacteria, termed anaerobic, that require a depleted oxygen environment to function. Among these are the "denitrifying" bacteria that convert toxic nitrate into beneficial nitrogen. The primary objective of a DSB is to provide a layer of very low oxygen, termed hypoxic, where bacteria can function anaerobically. The potential harm is in creating a layer completely devoid of oxygen, termed anoxic, where "reducing" bacteria can convert sulfate into hydrogen sulfide (rotten egg smell). This and other toxins can dangerously accumulate in a sand bed that is too deep or not properly maintained.

The prevailing wisdom is that the worms and benthic organisms are vital to maintaining a healthy DSB. In addition to cleaning the sand, it is believed their gentle agitation of the bed helps deliver nutrients to the bacteria while preventing truly anoxic conditions.

DSB.jpg


- Benthic: surface and near sub-surface sand bed layer.
- Hypoxic: low oxygen.
- Anoxic: no oxygen.
- Anaerobic: requires depleted oxygen to function.
- Denitrifying: converts nitrate into nitrogen.


The full benefits and challenges surrounding deep sand beds are still a matter of some debate, so it is important to point out that the conversation is often confused by competing terminology. Environmentalists often borrow the term anoxic (labeled in blue) to mean extremely hypoxic, and anaerobic (labeled in blue) to mean truly anoxic. Also, both the nitrifying and denitrifying bacteria can be referred to as facultative. They are actually the same bacteria, functioning differently.

Here are some general rules of thumb for maintaining a DSB. It should be at least four inches deep but no more than six, consisting mostly of fine grains, sometimes called "oolite" or "sugar-fine". Keep the benthic and worm populations healthy by avoiding Sand-Sifting stars, most crabs, and limiting hermits. Occasionally rejuvenate these populations with fresh liverock or true livesand from a well established aquarium, as this may be key to long term success. The sand bed should only be disrupted very gently over time. Brittle and baby stars, as well as Nassarius and Cerith snails, provide a slow and beneficial agitation of the sand, but vacuuming should be performed with great care, if performed at all. Remember, a deep sand bed is a living thing that must be kept in careful balance.

General Rules of Thumb

- 4" to 6"; fine-grain; do not disturb or disturb with care.
- Helpful: Brittle & baby stars, Nassarius & Cerith snails.
- Unhelpful: Sand-Sifting stars, most crabs, too many hermits.
- Rejuvenate benthic and worm populations for long term success.



----------------------------------------
Article & Diagrams by: Whys. The following credits, listed in alphabetical order, are for collaborative work only and should not be assumed as endorsements of this article. Technical contributions: capn_hylinur, fsn77, jenglish, MattL, tmz, WaterKeeper. Additional peer review: Biologist, luther1200, jasonrp104, Nanook, rishma, Sisterlimonpot, thegrun, therealfatman.
 
Wow very informative without any dry long paragraphs. The graphics are great...I'm gonna save this as reference for myself...great work, Thanks.
 
Looking at that doesn't necesarily mean that you CAN keep a DSB. Good information, don't get me wrong, it's sort of a blue thumb though.
 
I would change "Among these are the "denitrifying" bacteria that convert toxic nitrate into beneficial nitrogen." to "...into nitrogen which is essentially inert."
 
I'm a little afraid of a DSB, and I'm just wondering - won't a good skimmer and weekly 15% water changes be sufficient to remove the nitrate?
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=15155717#post15155717 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by sassyfrassy
I'm a little afraid of a DSB, and I'm just wondering - won't a good skimmer and weekly 15% water changes be sufficient to remove the nitrate?

There are various methods to address Nitrates, and a DSB is but one. Your water changes and skimming are one way to remove them, or rather, keep them under control....and running a ULNS system (Zeovit, Prodbio, NeoZeo, Vodka Methso) is another..each has their own approach.

DSB can work as well, and this is great information. Jsut make sure you stay away from the 2"-4" sand depth, that's all :-).
 
As I was reading the definitions of "anoxic" and "anaerobic", I was saying to myself, "well, that's debatable". Then, you addressed this debate in the next paragraph. Kudos! Thanks for your hard work.
 
Great article! Kept me interested and void of attention deficit. Now I realize that I already have a DSB (4") and don't feel that I really need to add another piece into the system for a DSB greater than 4".

I saw a picture posted here, with someone who has a DSB as part of their filtration system, in a large garbage can (he was one of the tanks of the month - can't remember which month though). It looked as though his main tank had at least a 4" layer. So, is there any benefit to having a DSB that deep as well as at least 4" in the main tank?
 
I think the graphic could be improved by adding a ruler showing the depth of the SSB and DSB to the side. You just know some people are going to be lazy and only refer to the graphics and if thats the case then this important piece of information is missing. Very valuable post overall though.
 
First up - Great introduction. Please do not take what follows as mean-spirited criticism.

"Tho based on a remarkably simple idea..." would be more correctly written as "Although based..." or "Though based...".
"All of this takes place within a layer of sand oxygenated by moving water, termed oxic, and the bacteria there require oxygen to function, termed aerobic."
This sentence is a bit clunky. It might help new readers to introduce one new concept per sentence. My suggestion: "All of this takes place within the oxic zone, a layer of sand oxygenated by moving water. The bacteria found there are aerobic, meaning they require oxygen to function."
"The nitrate simply accumulates in the water column to be removed by ritual water change."
"Ritual water change" calls up all sorts of images, from baptism in the Jordan, to ritual bathing in the Ganges, to the Fremen and Bene Gesserit of the Dune series. Unless you mean to imply that water changes are an act of faith*, you might want to use an adjective like "regular" or "periodic" instead of "ritual".

*Some people don't perform routine water changes, and believe that others do based more on faith than evidence.
Environmentalists often borrow the term anoxic (labeled in blue) to mean extremely hypoxic, and anaerobic (labeled in blue) to mean truly anoxic.
I think the term you want here is "Environmental scientists", not "Environmentalists". Environmental scientists study the environment, conduct research, create computer models, etc. Based on the results of the studies, research, and models, environmentalists strive for personal and political action to benefit the environment. Although many environmental scientists are environmentalists, the vast majority of environmentalists are not environmental scientists. It's a picky, but often important distinction, especially to environmental scientists.
Also, both the nitrifying and denitrifying bacteria can be referred to as facultative. They are actually the same bacteria, functioning differently.
I'm running out of time to type this, so I'll just put the raw info here, without formatting it for the essay. Facultative anaerobic bacteria are capable of surviving in oxic or anoxic conditions, running their metabolism in aerobic or anaerobic modes as needed. Obligate anaerobic bacteria are restricted to an anaerobic metabolism, just as obligate aerobic organisms, like humans, are restricted to an aerobic metabolism. Oxic conditions are actively toxic to anaerobic bacteria, just as hypoxic and anoxic conditions are toxic to humans. Too much detail? Dunno, but if you're going to define "facultative", it helps to define "obligate" for comparison/contrast.
 
Last edited:
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=15164396#post15164396 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Eb0la11
I think the graphic could be improved by adding a ruler showing the depth of the SSB and DSB to the side.
I wish I could say everyone agrees on the depths. Unfortunately, they don't. At the more advanced levels, the conversation quickly devolves into granular theory and advective currents. After that, it's name calling. ;)

Sorry, but if someone is genuinely interested in a DSB, then they need to do a little reading. I do thank you for your thoughts. :)
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=15164770#post15164770 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by KarlBob
"Tho based on a remarkably simple idea..." would be more correctly written as "Although based..." or "Though based...".
"Tho" is a real word. Webster says so. :)

<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=15164770#post15164770 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by KarlBob
This sentence is a bit clunky. It might help new readers to introduce one new concept per sentence. My suggestion: "All of this takes place within the oxic zone, a layer of sand oxygenated by moving water. The bacteria found there are aerobic, meaning they require oxygen to function."
That's not bad, but it's posted now, so it's too late. Clunky will have to do. It is at least succinct.

<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=15164770#post15164770 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by KarlBob
*Some people don't perform routine water changes, and believe that others do based more on faith than evidence.
My thinking exactly. ;)

<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=15164770#post15164770 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by KarlBob
I think the term you want here is "Environmental scientists", not "Environmentalists". Environmental scientists study the environment, conduct research, create computer models, etc. Based on the results of the studies, research, and models, environmentalists strive for personal and political action to benefit the environment. Although many environmental scientists are environmentalists, the vast majority of environmentalists are not environmental scientists. It's a picky, but often important distinction, especially to environmental scientists.
That's a terrific point. I'll quote this in the posted stickey. It's an open thread so feel free to add to it.

<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=15164770#post15164770 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by KarlBob
I'm running out of time to type this, so I'll just put the raw info here, without formatting it for the essay. Facultative anaerobic bacteria are capable of surviving in oxic or anoxic conditions, running their metabolism in aerobic or anaerobic modes as needed. Obligate anaerobic bacteria are restricted to an anaerobic metabolism, just as obligate aerobic organisms, like humans, are restricted to an aerobic metabolism. Oxic conditions are actively toxic to anaerobic bacteria, just as hypoxic and anoxic conditions are toxic to humans. Too much detail? Dunno, but if you're going to define "facultative", it helps to define "obligate" for comparison/contrast.
You are correct in your criticism. Thus "facultative" was removed from the final version. Just gets too complex with too little benefit for newbies.

I thank you for your thoughts. :)
 
:lol: am i the only one who noticed the gnomes digging a cave! :lol:

that right there is the biggest part of any DSB!!!
 
Back
Top