shabreeson
New member
i know that flame breeding has been done before, but how is that when i have been warned not to have even two in a 150 gallon tank?
That is just like a pair of Centropyge behave!<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=8214880#post8214880 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by mwp
I have to just jump in and say that while I have 2 flames currently coexisting in the 24 gallon cube, it's a) experimental and b) not been long enough to say for certain that it will work. So far other than some minor fin damage the 2 are doing OK, but I haven't seen any of the affiliatory interactions one might expect between a true pair (i.e. staying TOGETHER, currently the larger one would best be described as only "tolerating" the little one but giving chase fairly often). I did add them at the same time and used a large size discrepency as the criteria for chosing the two I'm working with.
FWIW,
Matt
There is lots of bad information out there. Also lots of old information....I would say keeping multiple species of angels and/or pairs has only recently been gaining wide acceptance since the release of S.Michael's 2004 book Angelfishes & Butterflyfishes. Before that it was a bit of a no-no to all but a relatively smaller group of the initiated.<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=8208326#post8208326 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by shabreeson
i know that flame breeding has been done before, but how is that when i have been warned not to have even two in a 150 gallon tank?
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=8214880#post8214880 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by mwp
I have to just jump in and say that while I have 2 flames currently coexisting in the 24 gallon cube, it's a) experimental and b) not been long enough to say for certain that it will work. So far other than some minor fin damage the 2 are doing OK, but I haven't seen any of the affiliatory interactions one might expect between a true pair (i.e. staying TOGETHER, currently the larger one would best be described as only "tolerating" the little one but giving chase fairly often). I did add them at the same time and used a large size discrepency as the criteria for chosing the two I'm working with.
FWIW,
Matt
Flames are easy to pair - the hard part is to find a female or juvenile. If you have a relationship with your LFS see if they'll hunt one down for you. IME they tend to forget about it unless you pay in advance - but maybe your relationship is better than mine<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=8240263#post8240263 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by sonofgaladriel
I've had a 3 inch flame angel in my 240 for about 8 months. I love these fish and would really like to add another, both for asthetic and for potential bonding issues.
The tank is about 14 months old, with most of the rock, water, and corals comming from a 180 that was 4 years old. The tank is heavily stocked so there is ample hiding places for the new angel.
Would it be unwise to add a smaller one or perhaps a larger one to the tank at this point?
I'd really like to have another flame in there but won't if advised against it.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=8237932#post8237932 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Angel*Fish
IMHO a tank this size will not meet the nutritional needs of even 1 flame angel as it needs to graze the rock in addition to the food you give it.
In addition, I promise you in a tank this size these two fish are quite stressed. And it's so small --- it possibly might not even be any kind of 'test' as to whether or not they would get along once given a humane sized space.
You will see chasing behavior that establishes who the boss is. But if the female stays "trapped" up in a corner of the tank more than a day, they should be separated - but this is not likely if adding them at the same time.
I've heard this all before time and again with regards to Synchiropus splendidus. Not to sound perturbed, but "hogwash"! http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/s...threadid=824111
Using the words "possibly" & "might", what I said was "And it's so small --- it possibly might not even be any kind of 'test' as to whether or not they would get along once given a humane sized space." I was referring to the possibilty that these fish might not react normally due to crowding (which I assume you have heard of as it is common practice in LFS) and that possibly once they are in a more spacious relaxed environment they might find issues of dominance suddenly more important. That said, if I was forced to vote on it, I'd say they are probably forming a pair and will be fine in a larger tank --- which I hope you will soon be providing.First and foremost, confined spaces MAGNIFY compatibility issues. If they get along in the 24, the should get along in a "humane" sized space (assuming you're notion of a humane sized space is something significantly larger than a 24 gallon cube).
I will never understand why anyone assumes that breeding is evidence of "a good sign that the fish are healthy and comfortable in the environment provided". Do you have to be healthy and comfortable to breed? OK, probably some animals do, but many animals don't. And I don't see what makes anyone decide that they know that these fish are breeding & therefore comfortable.well if half the species in the tank are regularly spawning, as an aquarist that's a good sign that the fish are healthy and comfortable in the environment provided.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=8243321#post8243321 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by mwp
Thankfully, my smaller fish has never been "pinned" in the corner, has it's own little hiding spots, and gets plenty of food. We're still having "chasing" issues though..I'd like to think that given a little more time that will subside as well and they'll settle into peaceful coexistence.
MP