Gac/gfo

a.browning

New member
Rather than run both at the same time, does it hurt to run carbon 2 weeks then GFO 2 weeks and switch off? I have one reactor and was wondering if this would be feasable. Thanks!
 
From a cost perspective GFO has a useful life of a few months running in a reactor vs. a week or so of carbon. I think you can get a reactor on amazon for like $30
 
GFO has a useful life of a few months running in a reactor

Have you used GFO and found it to last a few months in your system while still being effective? That seems somewhat unlikely to me. Even if it was not depleted in its phosphate binding in a few weeks (which would only happen in a system with very low phosphate to begin with), I'd expect it to be covered by organics and bacteria in a few weeks, preventing further use as a phosphate binder.

If phosphate is elevated, GFO can be depleted in a few hours. It all depends on how much phosphate the system is delivering to the GFO. I replace my GFO in about 2 weeks, and I replace most (but not all) of the GAC at the same time.
 
Good point, I usually change mine every six weeks, but I don't have a phosphate problem. What your saying is if the system is saturated the gfo will burn out quickly.Thanks doc :)
 
I replace my GFO in about 2 weeks, and I replace most (but not all) of the GAC at the same time.

Which is why I wonder why OP would want to go through the trouble of constant switching. When I was running GFO / ROX, they were in the same reactor and I changed them out every 2 to 3 weeks (regardless).
 
Sounds like it's good to run both at the same time! I had just always heard the GFO needs to "tumble" while the carbon should have a different flow rate. If it's fine to put them both in there then that's what I'll do.
 
Back
Top