genius or crackpot salesman

Deltasigpony

New member
this is a post from another site. i personally dont dispute the advantage of useing such a filter but i do dispute his thoughts on wc and most of the other things that he claims. what do you think?


"Mega Powerful Nitrate and Phosphate Remover - DIY!

Are you tired of green on your rocks? Do you have to clean your glass more than once a week? Well then I'm sure you've been told (or you've figured out) that your Nitrate and/or Phosphate are too high. Sure enough, if these are too high, the green starts growing. Phosphate is the important one: If you can detect any phosphate at all with a hobby test kit (like Salifert), then it's high enough to cause algae to grow. So, what can you do?

Build an algae scrubber! An algae scrubber, also known as a turf algae filter, a turf scrubber, or an algae filter, basically filters your water clean of nitrate and phosphate so that the green on your rocks and glass goes away. It does this by "moving" the growth of the algae from the tank to a "screen" outside of the tank. The idea is that you create a better growing environment on the screen than occurs in the tank, so that the algae grows on the screen instead. It works great! Here is my display, December 2008:

http://www.radio-media.com/fish/WholeTank-12-29-2008small.jpg
Hi-Res: http://www.radio-media.com/fish/WholeTank-12-29-2008.jpg
Details: http://www.radio-media.com/fish/Tank.htm

Here's what you can expect: If you build your algae scrubber properly, your nitrate and phosphate will be incredibly low, sometimes unmeasureable by hobby test kits, within eight weeks. I use Salifert test kits, and the readings I get are "clear" (zero) for both the Nitrate and the Phosphate tests. This is what you want. If you have been trying to get this yourself, then an algae scrubber is for you.

Here is the original DIY Algae Scrubber in a 5-gallon bucket that I started off with; it was the only filter I had (other than the live rock) on my 100 gallon reef:

http://www.radio-media.com/fish/BucketOnSink.jpg




Here is the filter in operation with the lights on:

http://www.radio-media.com/fish/BucketInOperation.jpg




I have since had an acrylic version made, using T5HO bulbs; it is the long black box setting here on the sump:

http://www.radio-media.com/fish/TankAndSump.jpg




Here are the only things you need to build a bucket version of this filter:

http://www.radio-media.com/fish/AllPartsSmall.jpg




My nitrate and phosphate are zero (clear, on Salifert test kits), and the only thing in my sump is water and the scrubber pump. I removed the skimmer, carbon, phosban, polyfilter(s), and filtersock; I don't use ozone, vodka, zeo, or anything else. I'm feeding massive amounts too; enough that if I had my previous filtering setup, I'd have to clean the glass twice a day, and everything in the tank would be covered in green or brown algae. Amazing. And it's not just my tank; over the last six months, hundreds of people have built their own versions of an algae scrubber. Every one has gotten reduced nitrate and phosphate readings, and many of them have completely wiped out all nuisance algae, right down to the bare rock, sand and glass.

The only thing you need to decide on is how big your scrubber screen needs to be, and if you want it to be in your tank's hood, or in a bucket, or in your sump. The basic rule is one square inch of screen for each gallon of tank water (if the screen it lit on both sides); the screen size should be twice this if the screen is lit up on just one side. A 12 X 12 inch screen, lit on both sides, = 144 square inches = 144 gal tank; a 7 X 7 inch screen lit both sides = 49 gal tank; a 6 X 6 lit both sides = 36 gal tank. Algae scrubbers get really small as you can see. A 12 gal nano tank needs just 3 X 4 inches! This small thing can replace the skimmer, refugium, phosphate removers, nitrate removers, carbon, filtersocks, and waterchanges, IF THE PURPOSE of these devices is to reduce nitrate, phosphate and nuisance algae. If these devices have any other purpose, then they can't be replaced. If your tank is bigger than a 75, then just start with a 5 gallon bucket size and see how it goes. You can always add a second one, or build a bigger one later.

My example bucket version takes about 4 hours to build. Water goes in the pvc pipe at the top, flows down over the screen, then drains out the bottom. That's it! Oh, and it has clip-on lights. I can feed the tank a lot of food, and anything not eaten by the corals or fish eventually ends up as algae on the screen (instead of algae on your glass or rocks.)

Here are some examples of DIY algae filter screens already built, from a simple nano one:

http://www.radio-media.com/fish/5galNanoDay00screen.jpg
http://www.radio-media.com/fish/5galNanoCompartment.jpg
http://www.radio-media.com/fish/5galNanoLight.jpg

to larger ones:

http://www.radio-media.com/fish/UserMinzukOnUR.jpg
http://www.radio-media.com/fish/UserI_limantaraOnAC.jpg
http://www.radio-media.com/fish/UserJohntOnUR-7.jpg
http://www.radio-media.com/fish/UserJski711onRS-2.jpg
http://www.radio-media.com/fish/UserThauro77onSWF-5.jpg
http://www.radio-media.com/fish/UserVargaOnRS.jpg


Here are some advantages of an algae scrubber:


o Allows you to feed very high amounts without causing nuisance algae growth in the tank.

o Can replace waterchanges, IF THE PURPOSE of the waterchange is to reduce nitrate or
phosphate or nuisance algae. Otherwise, it does NOT replace the water change.

o Grows swarms of copepods.

o Increases pH.

o Increases oxygen.

o Will NOT spread algae into the tank. It removes algae FROM the tank.

o There is no odor from the algae (only a slight ocean smell when cleaning it).

o Is very quiet when flowing, similar to a tabletop decorative waterfall. Your pumps are louder.

o Introduces no microbubbles when built properly.

o Removes ammonia too.

o Works in saltwater, freshwater, and ponds too.



How to build it:

First, get your screen. Any stiff material that has holes in it, like knitting backing, plastic canvas, rug canvas, gutter guard, or tank-divider will do. Try going to hardware stores, craft stores, garden stores, sewing stores, or just get one of these online (in order of preference):

http://www.craftsetc.com/store/item.aspx?ItemId=43844
http://www.aquaticeco.com/subcategories/2/Tank-Dividers/tank divider/0

Don't use window screen though. The main problem with this kind of "soft" screen will be getting it to hold its shape; it will bend and fold too much. Stiff screen is easier to make stay put, and easier to clean.

If you have a nano with a filter hatch on TOP of the hood, then it's super easy: Just cut a piece of screen to replace the sponge filter, and put it where the sponge filter went. Leave the hatch open, and set a strong light on it, facing down directly on the screen. This is a good bulb to get; it will be bright enough to power the screen, and to light up your nano too:

http://www.buylighting.com/23-Watt-R40-Compact-Fluorescent-Flood-5100K-p/tcp1r4023-51k.htm

If your nano does not have a filter hatch on top of the hood, or if you have a regular tank, then here are the options for larger versions:

http://www.radio-media.com/fish/OverflowFeed.jpg
http://www.radio-media.com/fish/PunpFeed.jpg
http://www.radio-media.com/fish/SumplessFeed.jpg




The first and main thing to consider is the flow to the screen. You need about 35 gph (gallons per hour) for every inch of width of the screen. Thus, a 2" wide screen would need 70 gph, and so on. Here is a chart:

Screen Width-----Gallons Per Hour (GPH)

1" 35
2" 70
3" 105
4" 140
5" 175
6" 210
7" 245
8" 280
9" 315
10" 350
11" 385
12" 420
13" 455
14" 490
15" 525
16" 560
17" 595
18" 630
19" 665
20" 700


Note that for flow, it does not matter how tall your screen is, just how wide it is. Let's start with an overflow feed: In this case the amount of flow is pre-determined by how much is already overflowing; the maximum flow you'll get to the screen will be what's going through your overflow now. This is easy to figure out by counting how many seconds it takes your overflow to fill a one-gallon jug:

60 seconds = 60 gph
30 seconds = 120 gph
15 seconds = 240 gph
10 seconds = 360 gph
8 seconds = 450 gph
5 seconds = 720 gph


Take this gph number that you end up with, and divide by 35, to get the number of inches wide the screen should be. For example, if your overflow was 240 gph, then divide this by 35 to get 6.8 (or just say 7) inches. So your screen should be 7 inches wide. How tall should it be? Tall enough for it to stick into the water below (this will keep it quiet). But for flow, how tall it is not as important as how wide it is.

Pump feeds: Since with a pump you have control over the flow, start with the size screen you can fit into your space. If the screen will go into your sump, then measure how wide that screen will be. If the screen will go into a bucket, then measure how wide that screen will be. Take the width you get, and multiply by 35 to get the gph you need. For example if you can fit a 10 inch wide screen into your sump or bucket, then multiply 10 by 35 to get 350 gph. Thus your pump needs to deliver 350 gph to the screen.

You can construct your setup using any method you like. The only difficult part is the "waterfall pipe", which must have a slot cut lengthwise into it where the screen goes into it. Don't cut the slot too wide; just start with 1/8" (3mm), and you can increase it later if you need to, based on the flow you get. I used a Dremel moto-tool with a "cut off wheel":

http://www.radio-media.com/fish/PipeDremel.jpg


Now install the pipe onto the screen/bucket by tilting the pipe and starting at one side, then lowering the pipe over the rest. You may have to wiggle the screen in some places to get it to fit in:

http://www.radio-media.com/fish/PipeInstall.jpg


Lighting: This is the most important aspect of the whole thing. You must, must, have strong lighting. I'll list again the bulb I listed above:

http://www.buylighting.com/23-Watt-R40-Compact-Fluorescent-Flood-5100K-p/tcp1r4023-51k.htm

... This the MINIMUM wattage you should have on BOTH sides of your screen. You can get even higher power CFL bulbs, or use multiple bulbs per side, for screens larger than 12 X 12 inches, or for tanks with higher waste loads. The higher the power of the lighting on the screen, the more nitrate and phosphate will be pulled out of the tank, and the faster it will happen. You cannot have too much light. When some folks report back that their algae scrubber is not growing algae or working well, the problem is ALWAYS that they used weak lights, or the lights were more than 4" away. Every single time.


Operation:

Regardless of which version you build, the startup process is the same. First, clean the screen with running tap water (no soap) while scrubbing it with something abrasive. Then dry it off and sand it with sandpaper on both sides. Then get some algae (any type) from your system and rub it HARD into the screen on both sides, as deep and as hard as you can. Then run tap water over the screen to remove the loose algae pieces; you won't see the remaining spores that stick to the screen... they are too small, but they are there.

Put a timer on the light, for 18 hours ON, and 6 hours OFF. You will see absolutely nothing grow on the screen for the first two days. But on day 3 you'll start seeing some light brown growth, and by day 5 most of the screen should have a light brown coating. If this level of growth does not happen on your screen, your lighting is not strong enough (you used a weaker bulb), or it's not close enough to the screen (needs to be no more than 4" from the middle of the screen). Increase the bulb power, or move it closer.

When the screen looks something like this:

http://www.radio-media.com/fish/ScreenBuildDay9outSmall.jpg


...then you want to give it it's first cleaning, on ONE SIDE only. Take the screen to the sink, run tap water on it, and just push the algae off with your fingers (not fingernails):

http://www.radio-media.com/fish/ScreenBuildDay9scrubbing.jpg

Wait a week, and clean the other side, gently. Wait another week and clean the first side again, etc. After a while you'll have to press harder to get the tougher algae off, and after a few months you'll probably need to scrape it with something, and it may eventually get so strong that you'll need a razor blade to scrape it off. But for now, be gentle; you always want some algae to remain on the screen when you are done. NEVER clean it off completely. Algae has to remain on the screen to do the filtering.

Don't forget to test your Nitrate and Phosphate before you start your filter, and each day after. I use Salifert:

http://www.marinedepot.com/ps_AquariumPage~PageAlias~test_kits_salifert.html

Post your pics of how you build it, the growth day by day, and your nitrate and phosphate readings, so we can all see how you are doing! There is a lot of info that I did not include here (in order to keep this short), and I've been asked every possible question there is. So if you have an unusual situation, or you think you have thought of something "new", then post it :)
"
 
i read the whole tread on RS and it makes sense - just a lot of work involved and after while that filter is loosing its power so.... i think it's a great idea but it needs to by mastered
 
I saw this post a while back also.

Personally I think turf scrubbers are GREAT ideas for those who have room for them.

I have no doubt they remove a LOT of nutrients from the water, particularly nitrate and phosphate, based on what I see my refugium do in my little nano.


Add to that the fact that the evaporation from a turf scrubber can also help alleviate high temp problems.

However, also increases evaporation, and I would assume it could be dramatic increase.
 
Somewhere on the site, theres a 20 somthing plus page topic about this whole thing... "SantaMonica" is the creator, and i believe he is the same person that pushes this deal on RC, SW fish, Marine depot and every other forum you could imagine....

The one thing i noticed is lots of people arent willing to even try them based on reasons i dont really agree with, simply because "nobody has a full blown SPS tank with ONLY a scrubber" and "if it aint broke dont fix it"... Or people scraping the screen into the system and complaining about "tea" colored water....not really a great mentality to have, and its little things like this that COULD possibly change this hobby IF all the kinks were worked out.... Mainly this guy saying it completely replaces all other forms of filtration, because thats just not possible... Skimmers, refuge, DSB and TAS all do different things that can benefit your "ocean environment"

Yes i built one, Yes i am running it, and YES my nitrates, nitrites, ammonia and phosphates all dropped to almost 0 within the first 3 weeks, and yes algae growth in my display has come to a stop, and slowly recede... I am still running my skimmer, even though it doesnt seem to be doing AS much, its still doing something for now...

DSC01733.jpg


I think if people were a little more humble, and willing to try this in combination with other means of filtration, or in an SPS or full coral tank to prove that it could work, then they wouldnt have a bad rap... but as long as people arent willing to try new things, instead of insult them i dont think you will see much unless you just try for yourself... i know if i just used what most people said, it wouldnt have helped me

I mean seriously, there had to be a point in saltwater aquariums when skimmers just became readily available to the general public. Was everybody soooo apprehensive to try skimmers at first?
 
Dramatic evaporation increase could help highly stocked tanks who can utilize more kalk in their top off water.
 
Scrubbers are nice, a friend of mine bought one and she loved it. She had a nicely stocked 75 and used nothing for filtration but the scrubber. The tank had excellent water quality. She bought the consumer version not a diy version.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=14255564#post14255564 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Marklu
Dramatic evaporation increase could help highly stocked tanks who can utilize more kalk in their top off water.

Been there, done that, and got the T-shirt.

My nano (due to cooling fans) evaporates over 1 liter per day of water, and that's so long as the fans are OFF at night.

I used to top-off kalk with saturated kalk.

I had a BEAR of a time keeping stable calcium and alkalinity, and my aragonite sand was clumping badly.

I reduced my kalk by half, and now the problem is solved ;) and I do have a fair amount of growing, happy SPS and corraline growing in the tank.
 
This is nothing new, Scrubbers have been around a long time.

As stated above there is a thread on here about it. It goes by the same title and that thread was closed and Santa Monica was banned because the thread got out of hand. The same thing happened on the RF site.(actually they considered it spam) Also as stated above that title is everywhere he can post it.

I think there is a witch hunt out for those who employ this type of filtration in any form. I think that is why it is not wide spread that alot of folks like this filter system but don't say so, and or don't use it. Kinda like, if your not on the cutting edge then sit back and be quite. We don't need any back seat drivers.

I for one like to look at all things good and bad for our systems. We try so hard to keep the nusance alage out of our tanks and yet they exsist in the real thing.

Just my nickels worth.
 
Algae scrubbers have been around for a long time and have their pluses and minuses.

Friend of mine had one of the original designs ten years ago on a college biology tank. It worked great in a college biology lab where the swoosh and splash of water wasn't an issue. I doubt there are many hobbyists willing to put up with the noise and the mess though.

I however doubt any "witch hunt" is going on :rolleyes: . It's not cutting edge or old school, it's just an alternative approach that has major drawbacks, and the primary proponents seem to have a financial interest in it's adoption.

jmo,
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=14256812#post14256812 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Deltasigpony
see skunk that is the same perspective that i have i just dont feel it can replace skimmers and carbon and water changes

Yeah, well i will say my skimmer has almost stopped pushing out foam, so i cranked it down a 1/4 turn to push the darker stuff over the top... still not as dark as it was before i started running my turf...but its pulling out something so i will leave it? and the algae that was growing on my back panel is now loosing hold and receding... and as for carbon, i just replaced my phosban reactor with another carbon one just because i am anal about water clarity, i cant say the turf has caused any yellowing, because thats more common when people scrape the screens into the system, not remove them.

As for the "not being on the cutting edge" and "sit back and be quiet" comment, I am not looking for a reason to abandon the PM Bulllet 3 Skimmer and Panworld pump that cost a small fortune in them selves... i am just trying it for my self, in person, and seeing what the results are before i insult other people with no experience on the subject... you later state that in "the real thing" there is algae growth, but we try to eliminate it from our systems... thats why i am providing this simple bucket for it to grow, but not be visible in my display, its still there, but you dont look at it all the time
 
Santa Monica was banned on at least 10 forums, that I know of, for that thread. It just got too controversial, because he was indicating that you could completely do away with your skimmer.

Algae turf scrubbers DO work. They were in use before the advent of Skimmers. BUT, with the ability to use skimmers, Algae scrubbers became more of an inconvenience and less of a needed tool. Used in conjunction with a skimmer, they'd be great!!
 
Scrubbers are definitely a good way to filter your tank but I will always prefer macro algae. To me there is just too much involved with them. I know I would tire of cleaning the screen as often as needed. In my tank macro algae is a very important component of filtration as I do not run a skimmer.

The question is would you rather have a system with a fair amount of macro algae or a scrubber that may be a bit more efficient but with more upkeep required?
 
I was involved early on the Santa Monica thread that got closed here. This is one of countless threads he started on every conceivable SW site on the internet,

It seemed interesting at first, but went downhill quickly. He set up his "test" and claimed success of the system in less than 24 hr, and stated how he no longer needed a skimmer or any other filtration. He obviously had his intended results in mind before he ever set up a thing. He later put anyone who questioned his method on his ignore list.

ATS is not a new concept, and worth a good discussion but his spamming every reef site on the net and his attitude on the threads turned them into a circus which is why most of them have been closed.
 
Some of his claims are true and some are not. The problem is the guy is so darn condescending to anyone who questions his claims. I know he still has a thread on the RS site and he feels the need to bump it up every time it hits the second page. I think he suffers from OCD.
 
I was one of the guys PM'd by SantaM to check out his thread when it started. I followed it, but never posted in it. It seems as though he found every poster in the world who mentioned they run skimmerless or have in the past, in hopes they'd support his claims. By the end of it, it was those people he PM'd that were the ones he ignored.

I feel that he was trying to set up a second coming of the scrubber with himself as the recipient of the gains, and that was the source of the resulting woes.

All the other issues are par for the course for any method that goes against the grain. There are things in this hobby that can open up a can of worms at their mention. Some of these things change with the times as well. It wasn't long ago that macro refugiums weren't that popular. People have been bashing Marc Weiss products for years, and now carbon source dosing is popular. Claims of running skimmerless are often met with criticism, and can get ugly without any algal scrubbing involved.

We all need to decide for ourselves which equipment/filtration methods we want to employ on our systems. We don't need to give others a hard time for their choices.

There has never been more choices in reefing methods as there are now. The use of algae grown and culled outside the display (or tucked away in it) works. There has never been a better time to get a good skimmer as there is now and they work too.

FWIW, I have one tank with a skimmer and one without.



:)
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=14259504#post14259504 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Agu
Algae scrubbers have been around for a long time and have their pluses and minuses.

Friend of mine had one of the original designs ten years ago on a college biology tank. It worked great in a college biology lab where the swoosh and splash of water wasn't an issue. I doubt there are many hobbyists willing to put up with the noise and the mess though.

I however doubt any "witch hunt" is going on :rolleyes: . It's not cutting edge or old school, it's just an alternative approach that has major drawbacks, and the primary proponents seem to have a financial interest in it's adoption.

jmo,

Maybe witch hunt was not the best analogy. oops

While there are many with the tip/dump surge "noisy". The new style is quite.

The "primary proponets seem to have a finacial interest in is't adoption" your sig. line says it all.

You are right
"it's just an alternative approch"

I am not trying to be rude here.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=14260339#post14260339 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Skunkbudfour20


As for the "not being on the cutting edge" and "sit back and be quiet" comment, I am not looking for a reason to abandon the PM Bulllet 3 Skimmer and Panworld pump that cost a small fortune in them selves... i am just trying it for my self, in person, and seeing what the results are before i insult other people with no experience on the subject... you later state that in "the real thing" there is algae growth, but we try to eliminate it from our systems... thats why i am providing this simple bucket for it to grow, but not be visible in my display, its still there, but you dont look at it all the time

Nobody was directing anything at you or others. I hope that you didn't take it that way.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=14266467#post14266467 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by 2_zoa
Nobody was directing anything at you or others. I hope that you didn't take it that way.

No, i was not taking it personally at all, i am just saying i read that entire other forum that turned sour over petty arguments, and everything else i could get my hands on about scrubbers.... then instead of taking one persons word for it i tried it out to see for my self (everybody's system is different so it might not help in some cases), if it helps then sweet... if not it was 20$ and some parts i had lying around the fish room that i can return to parts, and have a bucket for some new project
 
Back
Top