Congrats on considering the idea of getting a microscope - but inexpensive and good don't usually go hand in hand when it comes to optics. Luckily, all you really need is a cheap dissecting scope. The number of disease problems that you can identify with a cheap scope is going to be many orders of magnitude better than you could ever do with the naked eye. A high quality, high powered scope will only increase that benefit by a small factor. You won't be identifying bacteria or anything, so you don't need a good compound scope. I took a quick look on Ebay and found this scope (No - I have not tried it myself, it is only representative of what might work well for you):
I'm writing a book on fish diseases and have decided that the readers must have at least a 60x dissecting scope in order to use the book effectively. Relying on gross visual symptoms simply does not work, yet asking the reader to buy a costly scope is also not practical.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.