Getting a microscope

Wooden-Reefer,

Congrats on considering the idea of getting a microscope - but inexpensive and good don't usually go hand in hand when it comes to optics. Luckily, all you really need is a cheap dissecting scope. The number of disease problems that you can identify with a cheap scope is going to be many orders of magnitude better than you could ever do with the naked eye. A high quality, high powered scope will only increase that benefit by a small factor. You won't be identifying bacteria or anything, so you don't need a good compound scope. I took a quick look on Ebay and found this scope (No - I have not tried it myself, it is only representative of what might work well for you):

http://cgi.ebay.com/BINOCULAR-STERE...emQQptZLH_DefaultDomain_0?hash=item5190ec5486

I'm writing a book on fish diseases and have decided that the readers must have at least a 60x dissecting scope in order to use the book effectively. Relying on gross visual symptoms simply does not work, yet asking the reader to buy a costly scope is also not practical.

Jay Hemdal
 
Another option if you don't mind used and waiting a bit you can most likely find a very good one on govdeals.com
 
FWIW, I'm very happy with my trinocular AmScope. Their cameras are not good at all, but the scope is very nice for the price.

Having the darkfield condenser option is very nice if you want to look at microfauna.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top