Thanks for all the feedback everyone, I would like to know the reason that doug doesnt like the 28-135? I actually have been reading up on the canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM Lens, and would like to get some feedback on this lens from anyone that has one or has used one.
See one here? This was actually taken with 2 umbrellas, one behind and above, the other at about a 60* angle from the fishes' perspective, and lower powered than the main.
Um, you used 2 umbrellas to photograph a tiny fish?? Don't you think that's a bit overkill? Also according to your Smugmug, the flash "Did not fire" on this image. Who to believe?
Um, you used 2 umbrellas to photograph a tiny fish?? Don't you think that's a bit overkill? Also according to your Smugmug, the flash "Did not fire" on this image. Who to believe?
Regardless the lighting looks good with a nice soft shadow. It's obvious that the light source was close and relatively large. There's no reason to suspect that the flash didn't fire when the flash is off camera it's not uncommon for the exif to report flash "off".
Aside from that it looks like a heavy crop from a larger image (softness and noisy pixels), or it's just over sharpened.
My only real issue with your picture (take it with a grain of salt, I'm not a pro by any means) is it looks noisy. I can see every single pixel, to me that isnt a sharp picture, it's just a heavy crop.
I still would be happy with it if I was taking it, but I wouldnt call it sharp
This, imo, is a sharp fish picture... I took this a while back.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.