I think you'll be fine. Many tanks have too much light IMO.<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=8140509#post8140509 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by SurfatC3G
Wow. Well, because of this thread im starting to question whether or not my 150w DE Pheonix 14k will be enough to support LPS at the bottom of a 24" deep tank.The light is going over a 37g Perfecto column tank. 20x18x24.
I have a single 250W pendant on a light mover, and it bleached the ric on the very bottom of my 120 gallon. I have some zoos halfway up, and they turned from mostly brown to bright green with a hint of purple. And they haven't grown for six months. All of my sps and lps are growing like crazy though. Regardless of what anyone says, a 250W DE on a magnetic ballast is enough light for anything, often too much light.<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=8144883#post8144883 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by SurfatC3G
Thanks again for the responses. I don't plan on having very much SPS stuff anyway. I would have went with a 250 but I was scared some of my shrooms and rics wouldn't like it. I will probably have a couple Caps about mid level and assorted branching sps near the top along with some lps. I wanted to keep the bottom open for some softies and some lps if I couldn't find a spot up higher for them.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=8141560#post8141560 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by benray4fun
I have to agree that the left side (hqi) is a tad brighter and is higher from the water line than the single ended bulb..."I'm impressed"
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=8145185#post8145185 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by RichConley
It's brighter, but its not more light. Its just light in a more focused area.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=8145335#post8145335 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by SurfatC3G
Yea my friend got a 250de 20k pendant and it bleached his ric's at the bottom of his 54g corner.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=8145273#post8145273 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by benray4fun
Rich, I firmly believe what my eyes process. I'm seeing it for myself in a real picture, don't you see it?...
Kind of like..."are you gonna believe what you're seeing or what I'm telling you?"...LMAO
I agree, the se has a reflector, is closer to the water surface and has a 100 watt advantage and brightness wise would seem to get outdone by the "inferior" hqi.<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=8146521#post8146521 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by benray4fun
Hmm, I see your point and it was well made...
Now I believe the SE or moguls need a better reflector that is more focused, so all that light is directed like that flashlight towards it's intended use.
On the other hand, that picture does show a SE pendant that is very well made and also focused with excellent reflectors. Unfortunately, it still doesn't outperform the HQI, even though it's 100 watts less. That just goes to show how well made the HQI's housing is and how far that technology has come.
What I'm saying is that if what you're saying is true, than the SE aren't as efficient...