human infection from aquariums??

herbert4

New member
I am trying to get my hospital to install aquariums and I got some lame responses like:

1) This is Arizona and we are in a drought

2) We are concerned about infection control

Are there any infections that can be transfered to humans wether they care for the aquarium or not??

Thanks
:confused:
 
herbert
Marine tuberculosis is probably the most serious disease you can pick up from your tank. But it's not likely to be picked up unless you have your hands in the tank. It's also not all that common in most tanks anyway. If you do a google search on mycobacterium marinum you can read about it. It's worth reading about it for educational purposes--esp. if you want to be prepared for the reasons that administration might resist your efforts.

If you want to give them reasons to put in an aquarium, find studies that support pet ownership and health benefits--I guess what I mean is think of the fish as therapy pets, much like the dogs, cats, or other animals that come to the hospital to play with the patients and lift their spirits. By the way I have been in doctor's offices that have fish tanks in them, so I'm not convinced it's a health risk for people to just look at the tank. I liked that doctor's office anyway--gave me something to watch while waiting--was definitely entertaining and relaxing.

Good luck.

Eric
ps a quick pubmed search (I don't have time to do a very thorough one at the moment) shows this link
pubmed link
oh and there are a couple other isolated case reports of vibrio or salmonella from tanks...but it's not something that's common, do a search on zoonosis and aquarium or aquaria
 
A most interesting question!

There are some studies surveying bacterial flora in aquarium fish with a view to assessing zoonotic risks, but they are few and far between. In particular have a look at Trust & Bartlet 1974 (Appied Microbiology) or Shotts et al. (1976) (J. Fish Res. Bd. Can.). I believe both studies were for freshwater fish and water samples. I did recent search for similar studies on marine fish studies but didn't find much. If you turn up anything, I would be most grateful for the reference (s). While many bacteria genera were represented in samples for these two studies, serious zoonotic pathogens were not readily evident. The most common bacteria isolated were Gram negative species of Pseudomonas, Aeromonas and Citrobacter. Although, some other genus/species were isolated that could cause infections in people. The results are a little confusing and as expected given that fish are living things that do not come from sterile environments! You need to read the papers to come to your own conclusions, however. It is worth noting that Mycobacterium spp. was not found, although a couple acid-fast colonies were noted in some samples. This is agreement with Eric's comments that Mycobacterium is rare (at least in freshwater fish). Both studies suggest that while the risk from zoonotic infection from aquarium fish is low, further study is warranted and contact with fish should be avoided to minimise the potential for infection. This should be a critical consideration as any aquarium should be located behind a wall to prevent access by the public for the safety of the public - and the fish. In this regard, I would be more concerned about risks from physical injury than from infections agents (and why the tank needs to be in a secure location). By eliminating contact with the water you essentially ameliorate the risk of contacting an infection. In reading all this, it seems to me that given high risk hospitals represent for nosocomial infections (i.e. infections originating in a hospital from people) - an aquarium would be the least of their worries! I agree with Eric that the benefits of having an aquarium in a public area as a way to reduce stress in a potentially stressful situation, especially for kids, far outweigh the minuscule risk from picking up an infection. I too have been to many doctors and dentists' offices where aquariums are present and strongly feel that people really do enjoy, and benefit from, the calming effect.
 
Thank you both very much. I will keep searching and let you know if/when I find anything else.

:bum: :smokin:
 
Rondelet
I agree with you about the nosocomial infections likely being a bigger problem than any aquarium in a hospital. The more I think about an aquarium in a hospital the more I think how great an idea this is--it's so calming to look at an aquarium. People go to public aquaria and spend hours watching one exhibit because they are so interesting and relaxing. How therapeutic would this be for those who are sick? I feel that the "reasons" that the administration gave herbert for not wanting to put an aquarium in are more of excuses than reasons.

What are the real reasons? They don't want to spend the money? They are afraid someone won't take care of it? I believe they have other motivations for resisting aquarium installment.
Eric
 
thanks, and I agree. I think it is just about $$$. They are penny wise and pound foolish.

I have been reading more and found that basically the only to contract the infection is by having broken skin and having that area in the water.

the patients and visitors in the hospital should not be putting their body parts in the water.

Thanks again

:bum: :smokin:
 
Back
Top