Stoneyscoral New member Dec 1, 2006 #1 This was sold to me online as a micromussa. The photo provided to me was not nearly this good and it was feeding at the time. Its a Favia, isn't it.
This was sold to me online as a micromussa. The photo provided to me was not nearly this good and it was feeding at the time. Its a Favia, isn't it.
V Vamp1975 In Memoriam Dec 1, 2006 #2 I would have to say favia by the way the polyps appear to be connected.
G GMAX New member Dec 1, 2006 #3 I dont know. I think it could be micromussa diminuta. Here is a link look and see what you think: http://whelk.aims.gov.au/coralsearch/html/701-800/Species pages/768.htm Note a similar species M. minuta even describes it as looking more like a Faviid underwater. Healthy looking coral either way though.
I dont know. I think it could be micromussa diminuta. Here is a link look and see what you think: http://whelk.aims.gov.au/coralsearch/html/701-800/Species pages/768.htm Note a similar species M. minuta even describes it as looking more like a Faviid underwater. Healthy looking coral either way though.
Creetin Limestone Cowboy. Premium Member Dec 1, 2006 #4 I second micro diminuta, How thick is the skeleton?
RandyO Active member Dec 2, 2006 #5 Tough one. I can't tell if it's a Musside or a Favide. Mussides have very pointy teeth on the corallites. Favides corallites are more smooth.
Tough one. I can't tell if it's a Musside or a Favide. Mussides have very pointy teeth on the corallites. Favides corallites are more smooth.