warrenmichaels
New member
I started a thread recently (link at end) dealing with sumps. I'm going to have to change things; maybe someone can offer a suggestion.
I have a 90 gal tank and an (as yet) undrilled 20 gallon long for a sump. The 90 gal in on a stand, so that the bottom of the tank is about 2 ft above the ground. This is not a tank for display, but for keeping things alive, so it's OK if it doesn't look the best.
In the 90 gal tank, I've already drilled two holes (unfortunately). This limits me somewhat. Water will circuit from the DT to SUMP to RETURN PUMP to CHILLER (just in the summer), and back to the tank. A broad estimate, assuming I have one line leaving the tank and one line returning, is that I might have 15' of tubing of between 3/4" and 1" above the sump. I will have an ATO with five gallons of water and a kalkwasser addition pump drawing from a 0.5 gal pail feeding into the sump.
So, if there is failure of some sort, an absolute worst case scenario is that I'll have DT, lines, 5 gallon water, and 0.5 gallon water draining into the tank.
I'm planning to keep the water level low enough in the DT that if the drain should fail, all of the water from the sump, plus the 5 gallon ATO and the 0.5 kalkwasser can all be pumped into the DT without incident.
Having enough volume in the sump for the draining of the DT, lines, 5 gal bucket, and 0.5 gallon pail is where things get tricky.
If I have no weir in the tank, I can plumb two drain lines using a Herbie style of sorts. The primary pipe can enter the tank and turn downward. The secondary pipe can turn upward. The water will flow through the primary as a siphon, and trickle through the secondary.
If I do this, I wonder if I should take the volume of the secondary line into consideration regarding how much volume the sump can hold. My gut feeling is that I should not, or should I?
In such a scenario, I'll have 1" height difference between the two drain pipes. Assuming that the water level will be slightly over the secondary pipe, This gives me 999 cubic inches, or 4.3 gallons.
This can work if I make some changes/compromises, but I'm not sure what I should change.
All of the above factors (assuming I take into account the volume of the primary drain line, the return line and NOT the secondary drain line) would sum to a volume potentially entering the sump of 2416 cubic inches (10.5 gallons). If I have the sump configured with a skimmer depth of 6.5" over 14 horizontal inches, the rest of the sump would have to be at 2.5" depth. This is JUST enough space to accommodate all of the above-mentioned water with absolutely no head to spare. If the water were to drop much at all, the return pump would not be supplied with water.
So, if I stick with things as they are, all will be fine so long as my ATO doesn't fail. This all supposes that I don't have to take the volume of the secondary drain into consideration.
Another option is to decrease the already small height difference between my primary and secondary drain. I can decrease the potential loss from the DT tank by 200 in^3 (0.9 gallons) for every 1/4" of height difference I remove.
Another option is to get a larger sump.
Another option is not to worry about all of the sources of water that I mentioned. It is, after all, unlikely that my ATO would fail in the ON position while the return pump has failed in the OFF position. This would save me from worrying about 5 gallons!
I could install a weir so that the maximum water I'd have to worry about leaving the tank would be the height that comes over the weir, which would be about 0.25" max, or 200 in^3 (0.9 gallons). This would save me from worrying about 3.5 gallons!
So, what solution, or combination of solutions should I choose? Should I worry about the volume of the secondary drain line?
Thanks
http://reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2688584
I have a 90 gal tank and an (as yet) undrilled 20 gallon long for a sump. The 90 gal in on a stand, so that the bottom of the tank is about 2 ft above the ground. This is not a tank for display, but for keeping things alive, so it's OK if it doesn't look the best.
In the 90 gal tank, I've already drilled two holes (unfortunately). This limits me somewhat. Water will circuit from the DT to SUMP to RETURN PUMP to CHILLER (just in the summer), and back to the tank. A broad estimate, assuming I have one line leaving the tank and one line returning, is that I might have 15' of tubing of between 3/4" and 1" above the sump. I will have an ATO with five gallons of water and a kalkwasser addition pump drawing from a 0.5 gal pail feeding into the sump.
So, if there is failure of some sort, an absolute worst case scenario is that I'll have DT, lines, 5 gallon water, and 0.5 gallon water draining into the tank.
I'm planning to keep the water level low enough in the DT that if the drain should fail, all of the water from the sump, plus the 5 gallon ATO and the 0.5 kalkwasser can all be pumped into the DT without incident.
Having enough volume in the sump for the draining of the DT, lines, 5 gal bucket, and 0.5 gallon pail is where things get tricky.
If I have no weir in the tank, I can plumb two drain lines using a Herbie style of sorts. The primary pipe can enter the tank and turn downward. The secondary pipe can turn upward. The water will flow through the primary as a siphon, and trickle through the secondary.
If I do this, I wonder if I should take the volume of the secondary line into consideration regarding how much volume the sump can hold. My gut feeling is that I should not, or should I?
In such a scenario, I'll have 1" height difference between the two drain pipes. Assuming that the water level will be slightly over the secondary pipe, This gives me 999 cubic inches, or 4.3 gallons.
This can work if I make some changes/compromises, but I'm not sure what I should change.
All of the above factors (assuming I take into account the volume of the primary drain line, the return line and NOT the secondary drain line) would sum to a volume potentially entering the sump of 2416 cubic inches (10.5 gallons). If I have the sump configured with a skimmer depth of 6.5" over 14 horizontal inches, the rest of the sump would have to be at 2.5" depth. This is JUST enough space to accommodate all of the above-mentioned water with absolutely no head to spare. If the water were to drop much at all, the return pump would not be supplied with water.
So, if I stick with things as they are, all will be fine so long as my ATO doesn't fail. This all supposes that I don't have to take the volume of the secondary drain into consideration.
Another option is to decrease the already small height difference between my primary and secondary drain. I can decrease the potential loss from the DT tank by 200 in^3 (0.9 gallons) for every 1/4" of height difference I remove.
Another option is to get a larger sump.
Another option is not to worry about all of the sources of water that I mentioned. It is, after all, unlikely that my ATO would fail in the ON position while the return pump has failed in the OFF position. This would save me from worrying about 5 gallons!
I could install a weir so that the maximum water I'd have to worry about leaving the tank would be the height that comes over the weir, which would be about 0.25" max, or 200 in^3 (0.9 gallons). This would save me from worrying about 3.5 gallons!
So, what solution, or combination of solutions should I choose? Should I worry about the volume of the secondary drain line?
Thanks
http://reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2688584