Is it true? Size of tank=Size of fish!

[Western_reefer]

I'm not sure it's really a matter of evolution, even 100 years ago people were shorter, basically because they didn't have the same nutrition we have today.

Which makes it crazy that there's a 12 ft skeleton from a few thousand years ago :eek1:

It actually is. Its a big difference if you believe in the Bible or Evolution. People who believe in evolution think that the earth had the same/worse conditions a long time ago as we do today. Well, that's not true at all. Now, lets stop here and make a separate thread so we don't hijack this thread like JHemdal said.

 

[iamwhatiam52]

INow, lets stop here and make a separate thread so we don't hijack this thread like JHemdal said.

Better yet, post a link to the 144 inch tall people and then drop the subject.

 

[dan223]

Better yet, post a link to the 144 inch tall people and then drop the subject.

Cannot provide link, only DOGMA .
Anyway yes back on track JHemdal mentioned the trout study that Ive read before, to me the study leads me to think size of the tank has nothing to do with growth, other than the smaller the tank the higher concentrations of biological waste, hormones and the like. The study shows with clean fresh water and food the size of their confinement did not matter.

 

[stumpovrtyme]