K konkers New member Feb 18, 2010 #1 The IS version of the Canon 100mm lens is over $400 more than the non-IS version. How useful is IS for aquarium photography?
The IS version of the Canon 100mm lens is over $400 more than the non-IS version. How useful is IS for aquarium photography?
cbrguy New member Feb 18, 2010 #2 To take an aquarium picture a macro lens will need to be on a tripod so I would say no it's not worth it.
To take an aquarium picture a macro lens will need to be on a tripod so I would say no it's not worth it.
K konkers New member Feb 18, 2010 #3 cbrguy said: To take an aquarium picture a macro lens will need to be on a tripod so I would say no it's not worth it. Click to expand... What about for top down photography? Do you still use a tripod there?
cbrguy said: To take an aquarium picture a macro lens will need to be on a tripod so I would say no it's not worth it. Click to expand... What about for top down photography? Do you still use a tripod there?
