Is there an environmentally friendly way of harvesting natural LR?

[Marinus]

Hi reefers,

We all love marine life, that's why we do what we do. I like seeing more and more artificial and land mined LR choices, but what is the actual situation regarding natural LR? Are there sustainable ways of harvesting it? How does one know where/how the LR comes from?

Cheers.

 

[Dmorty217]

Tampa Bay Saltwater (sponsor on here) takes dry rock and puts it in the ocean for a few months before harvesting and selling as live rock. I think this is what your looking for as far a sustainable LR harvesting

 

[Marinus]

Ah, cool. Thanks.

 

[jayball]

Tampa Bay Saltwater (sponsor on here) takes dry rock and puts it in the ocean for a few months before harvesting and selling as live rock. I think this is what your looking for as far a sustainable LR harvesting

They do that with the manmade walt smith rock at TBS and overseas.

 

[ryeguyy84]

there was a post in June about Tampa Bay

http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2509664

 

[wayne in norway]

Slowly. Live rock hasn't stopped being made, washed off by waves, broken loose and so on. But that requires managed balancing of the rate of 'deposition' against collection rate.

There's also the air freight to consider

 

[zachfishman]

KP Aquatics in the FL Keys also cultures live rock. Fun fact, their live rock farm was the origination of the Coral Restoration Foundation!

 

[Marinus]

Slowly. Live rock hasn't stopped being made, washed off by waves, broken loose and so on. But that requires managed balancing of the rate of 'deposition' against collection rate.

There's also the air freight to consider

Good point.

Logging in British Columbia Canada has come a long way from the old clear cutting days. I still hate seeing large patches of cleared trees because it's obviously still affects the wildlife. It's also ugly. However, it's sustainable.

I was just wondering what the situation was in the ocean. Using man made rock is sustainable but still not natural, although it has natural life on it, the rock itself is not natural.

Might sound ludicrous, and admittedly ignorant, but wouldn't farming coral for harvesting as live rock be more beneficial in maintaining a health ocean? It would create a more natural habitat for various life forms that can then also be collected in a sustainable way.

 

[atreis]

Might sound ludicrous, and admittedly ignorant, but wouldn't farming coral for harvesting as live rock be more beneficial in maintaining a health ocean? It would create a more natural habitat for various life forms that can then also be collected in a sustainable way.

Not ludicrous, but hard to justify from a business standpoint. (Coral sell for more money.) Some stores around here will remove dead coral from their displays and sell them as smaller pieces of live rock.

As a business model though, to use an analogy: A company makes an in-demand cell phone with a nice big screen. The phone costs $50 to manufacture, ship, etc... They sell it as a phone for $200 a unit. There's also a market for small computer pad devices for controlling audio systems, and the same device would work perfectly there too. Not all of the hardware in it would be needed, but it would cost more to make a separate device. Those audio control devices could sell for $75 a unit. Both markets are potentially profitable, but no company that can make $200 a unit is going to sell those same devices for $75.

 

[sde1500]

Good point.

Logging in British Columbia Canada has come a long way from the old clear cutting days. I still hate seeing large patches of cleared trees because it's obviously still affects the wildlife. It's also ugly. However, it's sustainable.

I was just wondering what the situation was in the ocean. Using man made rock is sustainable but still not natural, although it has natural life on it, the rock itself is not natural.

Might sound ludicrous, and admittedly ignorant, but wouldn't farming coral for harvesting as live rock be more beneficial in maintaining a health ocean? It would create a more natural habitat for various life forms that can then also be collected in a sustainable way.

Not all aquacultured live rock is man made. Some is mined from ancient reefs inland and put in the water to gather life. So still real live rock. OR at least that is how I've interpreted it. Also, whats wrong with man made not being natural? It is much easier than farming coral to create new live rock, and still good for the reefs.

 

[Marinus]

Not ludicrous, but hard to justify from a business standpoint. (Coral sell for more money.)

True, coral sells for more money. Just brainstorming.

Not all aquacultured live rock is man made. Some is mined from ancient reefs inland and put in the water to gather life. So still real live rock. OR at least that is how I've interpreted it. Also, whats wrong with man made not being natural? It is much easier than farming coral to create new live rock, and still good for the reefs.

Land mined coral sounds good, but is not really sustainable unless there's an endless supply.

I don't know what's bad about man made live rock, but from what I've read, it's heavier and not as affective (pound for pound) than natural live rock (other than marine pure which is very expensive).

Just brainstorming... all good info you guys are giving.

Cheers

 

[suta4242]

Have you ever seen the state of inner reefs after a cyclone? That's perfect for sustainable live rock collection, at least in QLD.

If you feel uneasy about taking LR from the wild, just make sure you're not replacing it with something man made that has had an impact on wild habitat during its production.

JM2c
:wave:

 

[Marinus]

Exactly, that's what I want to educated myself on.

I love this hobbie, just want to make sure my choices don't have a negative affect on the ocean and it's reefs.

Thanks for the comments.

Cheers

 

[muttley000]

Is it possible that the environmental impact of mining ancient reef rock is worse than removing rock rubble from the ocean?

 

[homer1475]

Exactly, that's what I want to educated myself on.

I love this hobbie, just want to make sure my choices don't have a negative affect on the ocean and it's reefs.

Thanks for the comments.

Cheers

This statement is ludicrous. The very nature of the hobby has a negative impact on the ocean.

While the progression of the hobby has brought about a lot of changes in the way things are cultured, your still depleting the ocean of its wild inhabitants, which in essence is having a negative impact.

Unless you can be 100% certain the creatures(fish, corals) your buying did not come from the wild(nearly impossible to tell, your LFS can tell you its aqua cultured, but do you really know?), your having a negative impact on the ocean.

 

[sde1500]

This statement is ludicrous. The very nature of the hobby has a negative impact on the ocean.

While the progression of the hobby has brought about a lot of changes in the way things are cultured, your still depleting the ocean of its wild inhabitants, which in essence is having a negative impact.

Unless you can be 100% certain the creatures(fish, corals) your buying did not come from the wild(nearly impossible to tell, your LFS can tell you its aqua cultured, but do you really know?), your having a negative impact on the ocean.

Are you sure about this? I can buy man made or mined rock, dry sand, fill the tank with water and synthetic salt mixes. Then buy some of the many captive bred fish and frags from people's tanks. And in doing so have no negative impact on the oceans. Why is it ludicrous to want that? This section is all about responsible reef keeping.

 

[homer1475]

Are you sure about this? I can buy man made or mined rock, dry sand, fill the tank with water and synthetic salt mixes. Then buy some of the many captive bred fish and frags from people's tanks. And in doing so have no negative impact on the oceans. Why is it ludicrous to want that? This section is all about responsible reef keeping.

Think you missed the part where I said, and I quote:

Unless you can be 100% certain the creatures(fish, corals) your buying did not come from the wild.

of course if everything is man made and aquacultured your not harming the ocean one bit. The problem arises when someone goes to their LFS and impulse buy's a coral or fish that is not aquacultured. Which happens more times then not.

 

[muttley000]

So if I use all dry man,are materials and buy a lionfish from a collector in the Caribbean did I have a positive impact?
I suspect the tuna sandwiches we eat in our lifetime have hundreds of more times impact on the oceans than our aquariums ever will.

 

[atreis]

So if I use all dry man,are materials and buy a lionfish from a collector in the Caribbean did I have a positive impact?

Small, but yes.

I suspect the tuna sandwiches we eat in our lifetime have hundreds of more times impact on the oceans than our aquariums ever will.

Probably, so don't eat Tuna, then you will have not outweighed your previous positive impact with a larger negative one.

 

[Subsea]

The collection of live rock and fish has little effect on the health of our oceans compared to elevated CO2 in the athmosphere and in some cases declining pH in the water.

The conversation is more academic than pragmatic. If you want to impact the ocean in a positive way: quit flying in airplanes, turn off the electricity to your home, become a vegan and grow your own food,