And whom is to blame for telling me about the adaptor in the first place?.<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7288452#post7288452 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by spawner
Wow Luis, get them an a microscope adaptor for the dig. camera and off he goesEnjoy zoea 5-6, not much changes until you get to around z9 or so.
Most of the appendixes have two pieces;the external one is called exopodite and the internal endopodite.But for practical use it is better to use them just for the external and internal uropods.It is shorter<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7288092#post7288092 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by FuEl
Nice, looking forward to more pictures.I never figured out what were exopodites or endopodites. Only terms familiar to me are uropod and telson. :lol:
do you think smaller species of tropical Stenopus should have shorter larval duration compared to S. hispidus?
Right,seems like smaller species are comparatively easier.(good for you Junkai<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7306894#post7306894 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by redcray
In the papers I sent Luis it is reported a larval stage duration of 43-77 days for Stenopus scutellatus (golden coral banded shrimp), against 119-210 days for Stenopus hispidus. They also used GABA (u-aminobutyric acid) to enhance molting and increase survivorship.
Matt
Well no,a real "scientific"larval description involves dissection and microscopic examination of larval pieces.This needs skills and knowledge only specialist researchers have.<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7301343#post7301343 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by StephenH
Luis,
Your process of identifying significant morphological changes and giving them stage/instar numbers sounds pretty academic to me. That's the way all larval development descriptions are prepared. They sometimes rear individual larvae in individual containers (using plastic *****-boxes) and look every day for an exuvia. However, we know that would not work for species like S.his. which have such long larval development times. The usual pitfall and source of confusion is not missing an instar, but having a larva molt without going to a more advanced development stage.
If you can create line drawings of the larvae from your photos you will have all the makings of a white-paper journal article.
-steve
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7310602#post7310602 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Luis A M
Right,seems like smaller species are comparatively easier.(good for you Junkai).So hispidus is the "ugly duck here,like amboinensis within Lysmata.
I donÃ"šÃ‚´t bet for GABA,eyestalk clipping,and things like that.TheyÃ"šÃ‚´re just research tools.