Larval Stenopus hispidus

Nice, looking forward to more pictures. :) I never figured out what were exopodites or endopodites. Only terms familiar to me are uropod and telson. :lol:
 
Wow Luis, get them an a microscope adaptor for the dig. camera and off he goes ;) Enjoy zoea 5-6, not much changes until you get to around z9 or so.
 
Thanks Matt,:)
This is indeed an interesting paper,though with some pitfalls.They didnÃ"šÃ‚´t monitor the larval development stages and somehow decided that at 35 days the larvae should be ready for their settlement experiments.Rearing/water conditions seem also poor.
This paper sounds familiar but from sometime in my pre-Internet life :p .Seems it was written ca.1980?.
PM the titles of those papers,I might have them.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7288452#post7288452 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by spawner
Wow Luis, get them an a microscope adaptor for the dig. camera and off he goes ;) Enjoy zoea 5-6, not much changes until you get to around z9 or so.
And whom is to blame for telling me about the adaptor in the first place?.:D
As far as Stenopus larval stages,I never found any published description.So the only thing I can do is to look for significant morphological changes and give them stage numbers.Not very academic:(
ArenÃ"šÃ‚´t you aware of ANY larval description,even unofficial?.I know the FIT raised them:rolleyes:
Nice you chime in (at last):)
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7288092#post7288092 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by FuEl
Nice, looking forward to more pictures. :) I never figured out what were exopodites or endopodites. Only terms familiar to me are uropod and telson. :lol:
Most of the appendixes have two pieces;the external one is called exopodite and the internal endopodite.But for practical use it is better to use them just for the external and internal uropods.It is shorter:p
 
Luis,
Your process of identifying significant morphological changes and giving them stage/instar numbers sounds pretty academic to me. That's the way all larval development descriptions are prepared. They sometimes rear individual larvae in individual containers (using plastic *****-boxes) and look every day for an exuvia. However, we know that would not work for species like S.his. which have such long larval development times. The usual pitfall and source of confusion is not missing an instar, but having a larva molt without going to a more advanced development stage.
If you can create line drawings of the larvae from your photos you will have all the makings of a white-paper journal article.
-steve
 
I wish you could use photo for line drawings but reviewer pretty much nuke that on spot, they get very picky about setation and such, and want to see all the detail, that only a camrea lucida can get. Stenopus isn't bad up to about zoea 6 or so then it gets messy with multiple instarts. There one paper on larvae of stenopus to zoea 5-6 and its a very poor paper. I would expect more papers to come out in the near future but not many people have the time and paitence to describe 10-12 larval stages.
 
Hmm, 10-12 larval stages. :eek2: If according to Luis estimation that each larval stage takes about 6 days and assuming there are no mark-time moults, larval duration could be as early as 60-72 days? Maybe someone should rear them using ocean zooplankton and see if it is really the case. :D

On the side track spawner, do you think smaller species of tropical Stenopus should have shorter larval duration compared to S. hispidus? Hope I'm not hijacking your thread Luis! :rolleye1:
 
Last edited:
do you think smaller species of tropical Stenopus should have shorter larval duration compared to S. hispidus?

In the papers I sent Luis it is reported a larval stage duration of 43-77 days for Stenopus scutellatus (golden coral banded shrimp), against 119-210 days for Stenopus hispidus. They also used GABA (u-aminobutyric acid) to enhance molting and increase survivorship.

Matt
 
GABA doesn't do anything at all. Their have been a few people who have reared hispidus in about 40 days, just because it might take us for ever to rear something in the lab doesn't mean it takes that long in the wild.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7306894#post7306894 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by redcray
In the papers I sent Luis it is reported a larval stage duration of 43-77 days for Stenopus scutellatus (golden coral banded shrimp), against 119-210 days for Stenopus hispidus. They also used GABA (u-aminobutyric acid) to enhance molting and increase survivorship.

Matt
Right,seems like smaller species are comparatively easier.(good for you Junkai:D ).So hispidus is the "ugly duck here,like amboinensis within Lysmata.
I donÃ"šÃ‚´t bet for GABA,eyestalk clipping,and things like that.TheyÃ"šÃ‚´re just research tools.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7301343#post7301343 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by StephenH
Luis,
Your process of identifying significant morphological changes and giving them stage/instar numbers sounds pretty academic to me. That's the way all larval development descriptions are prepared. They sometimes rear individual larvae in individual containers (using plastic *****-boxes) and look every day for an exuvia. However, we know that would not work for species like S.his. which have such long larval development times. The usual pitfall and source of confusion is not missing an instar, but having a larva molt without going to a more advanced development stage.
If you can create line drawings of the larvae from your photos you will have all the makings of a white-paper journal article.
-steve
Well no,a real "scientific"larval description involves dissection and microscopic examination of larval pieces.This needs skills and knowledge only specialist researchers have.
On the other hand the need of us hobbyists to determine the developmental stages of larval shrimp is just to evaluate their healthy growth.Larvae molt periodically and change into something different,a new "stage".It is like many small metamorphosis before the big final one.Now a distressed larva will keep molting but repeating the same stage till it dies.This is called marking time.
So it is OK if I can define stages where gross morphological changes show,which can be seen with a dissect.scope or the naked eye.These stages even if not "academic"will be of practical use for all new breeders.
ItÃ"šÃ‚´s like taking a train for a long trip;Knowing the name of all the stations,you know how far you are and if it goes in time.Or if the train is stopping:p
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7310602#post7310602 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Luis A M
Right,seems like smaller species are comparatively easier.(good for you Junkai:D ).So hispidus is the "ugly duck here,like amboinensis within Lysmata.
I donÃ"šÃ‚´t bet for GABA,eyestalk clipping,and things like that.TheyÃ"šÃ‚´re just research tools.

My S. cyanoscelis larvae are now slightly over 2 months. Estimated total larval length only 8-9 mm. No pleopod buds as yet from what I have observed. Might take longer than S. scutellatus since the former is a tropical species with large geographical distribution? :( Maybe for Lysmata someone should try L. grabhami. Might be an alternative to L. amboinensis. :p
 
No more pictures in this series:( Most of the larvae died when molting to Z5 at 23 days.Three survived but died two days later.For some reason larvae usually die during molting.
Telson of Z5 is ellipsoid,with a concave posterior edge.Endops are longer,reaching the end of the two marginal spines of the telson.Will make pics next time:rolleyes:
 
bumping an old thread

bumping an old thread

cause I have some (very few:( )larvae now.
This is a 16 days larva,I think it is zoea 4.This specimen shows 4 pairs of pereiopods (legs).I could only see three up to now.
Z4a.jpg

Pairs 1 &2 are biramous (two branched);pairs 3&4 uniramous (one branched).4th pair is less developed,both legs can be seen.
 
Luis these little zoea are at the same time wonderful and weird ! :D It´s seems to be a great feeling to see they grow and become a "real shrimp" like you saw on that L. amboinensis.
At what age Stenopus larvae reach meta ?
Anderson.
 
Back
Top