mag drive 9.5

If you valve back a pump, wattage does decrease....some, but not proportional to flow loss. If you dial the pump back to 1/2 the flow, the wattage does not drop by 1/2.

I like to use the right size pump instead of too big dialed back. More efficient that way.
 
Adding head to the pump.... Correct, that is the ENTIRE point of adding a valve. Add "head" to the pump... but that does not imply anything except that you are reducing the efficiency of the pump.
I didn't say otherwise. My point was head is head. A valve adds head the same as pluming does. People seem to think adding a valve partially closed is a terrible thing, but routinely use pluming that is 1/2 the size it should be and think nothing of it.
 
Tasty,

When you reduce the flow of a centrifugal pump, the amount of work done is decreased, so the wattage is decreased as well, it is simple physics. When the amount of work done changes, the power required to do that work changes as well.
 
That is not at all surprising. The 9.5 is a pretty strong pump and HOB overflow typically cant actually flow what their rating indicates. I would go with a Mag5. Mag7s are really loud for some reason. If you are unsure, you can get the Mag5 and also a Mag7 impeller. They are the same pump. Swap in the impeller and you have a Mag7.
 
yea there was no way that overflow would keep up i had the valve all the way open on my t connector and it still was way to much do you think the mag 5 will be big enough to keep up with the 800gph overflow without the 7 impellar?
 
HOB overflows can be tricky. A non siphon overflow has a max GPH. You can run as little as you want and as high as the overflow can handle.

Siphon overflows have a max and a minimum flow. As you can see, max is often far less than the advertised rating. The minimum is not stated. There has to be enough to keep bubbles pushed through the U Tube so that they dont accumulate. Its not that much. Typically 200 GPH or so. I think the Mag5 will be fine. Plumb it with a minimum of 3/4" tubing. 1" will get you a bit more flow.
 
yea i already have it all plumbed with 3/4 inch i just dont want a pump that isnt going to keep up with the overflow. ill try out the mag 5 and if i need more flow ill switch out the impellar like you said to a mag 7
 
Pumps dont keep up with overflows. Overflows only drain back whet is pumped in. A non siphon overflow rated for 1000 GPH could run just fine at 100 GPH.
 
hrmmm

a: check out what flow you get by using the calc. on the site here with that 9.5. Mag drives loose lots and lots of flow on head. a simple 90 degree elbow drops it quite a bit. honestly if you have the bucks, keep the 9.5 for later use or a back-up and get a 5... 7's are really loud idk why, but 4 of mine are all the same... LOUD. the 12 i have is not even as loud.

b: a magnetically driven motor has the same wattage/amperage draw regardless of load. i tested it out cause i was curious, but it makes sense. you are creating a magnetic field. load is shed from torque slipage between this field.

C: i run a mag7 on my 180. i spot feed 1-2 times a day. i run dual skimmers. both octos. i have no issues with parameters. in fact the only thing i check anymore is calc. It gets below 400 and i do a 30 gallon wc, which is about every 1.5 months using Aqua Vitro Salinity.
 
Not sure where you bought the overflow and pump, but maybe they have a decent return policy? If they recommended those as a set, I would have issue with it as they are mismatched.
 
Just hang onto it till your 90 days is up then sell it unless you have a local forum that you can sell it on.
 
I used a mag 9.5 on a 34 gallon display with a 15 gallon sump but I had a manifold on the return that pumps water into 2 nextreef reactors (carbon & gfo) and a chiller. It is a very strong pump but once you add more equipment, you will appreciate the power.

I have since used the pump on my 90 gallon frag tank that supplies my return, refugium, 2 reactors and a chiller. It is an awesome pump.
 
Not trying to beat a dead horse, but here are some pictures that show magnetic drive pumps power consumption changes with flow rate.

I did a Sedra 12000, and a Mak 4 Sedra is like the mag drive, in that it is a submersible pump, Mak 4, is a magnetic drive external pump.


First Picture Mak 4, with the valve closed most of the way (old ball valve could not close it all the way.
2011-05-28_21.47.41.jpg

73 watts

2011-05-28_21.48.29.jpg

Valve wide open 95 watts.

Sedra pump
Valve closed completely
2011-05-28_21.49.30.jpg

only 46 watts.

valve open completely, but still pushing about 4 feet of head through 1 inch pipe.
2011-05-28_21.49.47.jpg

83 watts, almost double the wattage.

Kim
 
I've done similar tests on a Mak4, Eheim 1260, Mag9, Velocity T4, and a couple others. Every one of them had reduced power use with reduced flow due to added head. Mind you, its not linear. You dont cut the flow 50% and get a 50% reduction in power use. Its still more efficient to use the proper size pump.
 
I just had to post that to counter a much older post where somebody said it did not matter what flow you had with a mag drive pump, the power consumption never changes...

This is why when meshmoding pumps people worry so much about putting to much mesh on the pump and causing the pump to overheat.

I could not agree with you more Scott, as long as you are using similarly efficiency pumps getting the correct size will use the least amount of power... But many times going to a more efficiant pump will be better even if it is bigger. Mag drive pumps are not very efficient in any size.
 
Back
Top