MrMikeB
New member
Bruce,
I know this thread has gotten out of hand, and probably really off topic - and I am probably to blame for some of this. However, I wanted to say thank you for your efforts. I think we all in MARS have recognized the contributions you have made.
I honestly wish we had more of an opportunity to get to know each other during your tenure, but honestly, you scared the **** out of me. When I first started with MARS, hearing you speak on the Q+A so authoritatively, I thought: "Wow, this guy really know his reef" even if I had a differing view. This can be good and bad at the same time when trying to facilitate a discussion and get honest feedback from participants. To some this can make you seem unapproachable, even though you have obviously proven the opposite. I don't think Paul, or anybody, tried to flame you here regarding the Q+A - they simply stated an opinion. But combative responses only further makes great dialog nearly impossible to achieve, and strengthened the misconception of you being unapproachable.
For the sake of all of us, Paul has extended an olive branch and has explained his POV as a miscommunication or translation of what was meant by his words. Please take it and lets move forward. I want to see you and everyone else in MARS back at the meetings and helping out. I think it would be a shame if so many years of experience were to be lost to us for something seemingly so trivial.
I know this thread has gotten out of hand, and probably really off topic - and I am probably to blame for some of this. However, I wanted to say thank you for your efforts. I think we all in MARS have recognized the contributions you have made.
I honestly wish we had more of an opportunity to get to know each other during your tenure, but honestly, you scared the **** out of me. When I first started with MARS, hearing you speak on the Q+A so authoritatively, I thought: "Wow, this guy really know his reef" even if I had a differing view. This can be good and bad at the same time when trying to facilitate a discussion and get honest feedback from participants. To some this can make you seem unapproachable, even though you have obviously proven the opposite. I don't think Paul, or anybody, tried to flame you here regarding the Q+A - they simply stated an opinion. But combative responses only further makes great dialog nearly impossible to achieve, and strengthened the misconception of you being unapproachable.
For the sake of all of us, Paul has extended an olive branch and has explained his POV as a miscommunication or translation of what was meant by his words. Please take it and lets move forward. I want to see you and everyone else in MARS back at the meetings and helping out. I think it would be a shame if so many years of experience were to be lost to us for something seemingly so trivial.