My Mushrooms won't grow...

rdb1357

New member
I have 6 blue green mushrooms, nut only two of them are open and colorful. The other 4 are small and dull in color. I have a carbon filter that the LFS said would remove any toxins that might be bothering the other ones. I have had them for 4 months abd they have not grown at all. All my levels are good and The LFS slao said to add iodine one a week for them, so I check the iodine levels and then add it to make sure there is not too much. This is a new tank, my first tank, it is 30 gallons with 28 lbs of LR and 15 lbs of LS. Two small fish, 12 hermit crabs and 6 snails. I also have some button polyps and zoanthus polyps. Any tips?
 
Whats your lighting like? Most mushrooms don't require much light, but they seem to grow much faster under good lighting.
 
The tank is a Ocean Bio-Cube with built in lights. They are Coralife 10,000k 36 watt, and a actinic 36 watt light. I have the rock they are growing on sitting on the sand near a large piece of LR. I did have closer to the light, but moved it further away now.
 
Maybe you just need to give them some time? Some mushrooms do tend to grow slower than others. I've never heard of anyone dosing iodine for mushrooms...
 
I stopped the iodine due to another post. From what I read, I thought that mushroooms had a tendency to grow somewhat fast and I have nothing new in 4 months, and 4 of them are very small and almost white, while 2 of them look normal. Does that sound okay, or do I need to do something?
 
They are not all white, just on the edges. They are greenish in the middle and half the size of a dime, while the other two are very green and a little bigger than a quarter. What is a bioload?
 
'Bioload' is, roughly, the amount of livestock in the system. More fish and inverts = more bioload.

Mushrooms (Actinodiscus species especially) feed by direct nutrient absorption, so the more nutrients in the water, the more the mushrooms have to eat. (Other genera such as Ricordea and Rhodactis feed also on macroscopic foods.)
 
Its pretty much always a good idea to feed phytoplankton or micro-vert to tanks with corals as most corals eat it.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=11416790#post11416790 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by John Zillmer
Mushrooms (Actinodiscus species especially) feed by direct nutrient absorption, so the more nutrients in the water, the more the mushrooms have to eat. (Other genera such as Ricordea and Rhodactis feed also on macroscopic foods.)

Wow, I learned something new today!
 
Regarding MMM's claims:

Not sure what 'most' means, exactly, but two points:

There are corals that eat phyto exclusively, and then there are corals that are indiscriminate between consuming phyto or zooplankton, and then there are corals (Fungiids, Mussids, and similar) that virtually never eat phyto. So phyto is not nutritionally relevant to some commonly kept corals.

Further, since prey size and composition are important to the capture rates of corals such as leathers and softies, products made of ground fish meals and egg yolks are not going to benefit these animals.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=11418836#post11418836 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by blide
(I don't think inverts count)

Ummm...why not? They eat, they poop...what difference does it make whether an animal has a backbone to the question of whether they have a biological impact on the carrying capacity of a system?
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=11418836#post11418836 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by blide
I don't think inverts count...



Ricordea are photosynthetic..

Well, strictly speaking, Rics are mixotrophic -- they get some energy from photosynthesis and some from active consuption/digestion. Just because an animal is photosythetic doesn't mean it does not eat.
 
Ricordea are more photosynthetic then say Rhodactis but they still require food from the water column whether it's zooplankton or larger foods. I read somewhere that Ricordea acquire up to 80% of their nutrition from the light and the rest from the water column. I forgot where I read that though.
 
Yes, you're right I meant to say more photosynthetic. :)

Didn't mean to contradict just trying to point out from expierence ric's don't really need to be hand fed food and live off "poop". I have 3 fish in my tank and there's not enough "poop" to go around.

Here's my resume... :D

ric2_377.jpg


newt54_382.jpg
 
Last edited:
Very Nice blide. What type/amount of light do you have them under and at what depth roughly? And How often do you do pwcs and how long have they taken to fill in like that? Very nice setup.

FTS? :)
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=11418717#post11418717 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by John Zillmer
Regarding MMM's claims:

Not sure what 'most' means, exactly, but two points:

There are corals that eat phyto exclusively, and then there are corals that are indiscriminate between consuming phyto or zooplankton, and then there are corals (Fungiids, Mussids, and similar) that virtually never eat phyto. So phyto is not nutritionally relevant to some commonly kept corals.

Further, since prey size and composition are important to the capture rates of corals such as leathers and softies, products made of ground fish meals and egg yolks are not going to benefit these animals.

Really now? I've always been told what I posted... By most I meant well... most. I suppose this could be wrong though now? Any articles to back this up?
 
Back
Top