Lunchbucket
Premium Member
sorry been gone for work...better answer the questions quick
Stoney Mahony - SG steady at 1.026
Chicago - alk has been low lately as the reactor slowed. was 7.5 a couple days ago now it's back up at 9.2dKH. Mg - 1350 ca 440. po4 undetectable w/ Salifert but haven't used my buddies colorimeter for quite sometime
Wade2185 - no kalk for top off as i have an electronic float style top off and don't want it dumping lots of kalk in at one time or getting stuck nuking the tank. i use a Ca Rx for all my alk and ca needs. i'd love to use kalk more...guess i could use it the old way in a drip system at night. kalk does help keep pH up and precipitates po4. my pH usually runs about 7.92-8.2 or so. i'd love to see it higher but i think the AZNO3 lowers it.
jackson6745 - i don't see any starfish anywhere. i have seen them in the past but they are all gone for quite sometime
Stoney Mahony - i have no filter media to be trapping detritus. only teh sump that gets vacced every other week and the sand gets vacced too
RichConley - i'm not sure i agree. bryopsis seems to grow in nutrient poor systems no matter what. IMO and from what i understand it will suck up po4 out of the water before it can be registered on a test kit. also bryopsis seems to live no matter what. rock was cooked when i started the tank over after a po4 crach from a certain salt brand in Jan or 04. rock was all cooked up and po4 media was used since day one. i use RO/DI water, feed light, keep a light bioload, do plenty of h2o changes, use po4 media, skim w/ a BIG skimmer...everything right IMO.
clkwrk - i agree that bryopsis is a beast and it seems that it can take po4 from anywhere quicker than any other organism
pennilessreefer - i'd agree that bryopsis can trap w/ the fern like structure. also i'm sure it can absort P eaisly into the skeleton
NuclearReefs - yep been in the same place since the day they were put in. i did add another tunze after they were in there though. and then i upgraded from a turbelle to a stream on that unit that hits the glass and disperses right by the coral in question. i don't believe teh flow is changed there. the prostrata right next to it blows like a mo fo
Big E - i've heard of the high pH thing too. just dont' like messign w/ parameters that much...seems sort of risky IMO
oligotrophic - sounds like lots of people are going w/ the po4 wicking philosophy. i'm thinking that is a good idea about removing from the rock and remount it
cieslin1 - flow looks good and everything is blowing around
KevinFJB - seems like the Rowaphos or the AZNO3 could be an additive to the recession. hope it isn't the AEFW's
Lunchbucket
Stoney Mahony - SG steady at 1.026
Chicago - alk has been low lately as the reactor slowed. was 7.5 a couple days ago now it's back up at 9.2dKH. Mg - 1350 ca 440. po4 undetectable w/ Salifert but haven't used my buddies colorimeter for quite sometime
Wade2185 - no kalk for top off as i have an electronic float style top off and don't want it dumping lots of kalk in at one time or getting stuck nuking the tank. i use a Ca Rx for all my alk and ca needs. i'd love to use kalk more...guess i could use it the old way in a drip system at night. kalk does help keep pH up and precipitates po4. my pH usually runs about 7.92-8.2 or so. i'd love to see it higher but i think the AZNO3 lowers it.
jackson6745 - i don't see any starfish anywhere. i have seen them in the past but they are all gone for quite sometime
Stoney Mahony - i have no filter media to be trapping detritus. only teh sump that gets vacced every other week and the sand gets vacced too
RichConley - i'm not sure i agree. bryopsis seems to grow in nutrient poor systems no matter what. IMO and from what i understand it will suck up po4 out of the water before it can be registered on a test kit. also bryopsis seems to live no matter what. rock was cooked when i started the tank over after a po4 crach from a certain salt brand in Jan or 04. rock was all cooked up and po4 media was used since day one. i use RO/DI water, feed light, keep a light bioload, do plenty of h2o changes, use po4 media, skim w/ a BIG skimmer...everything right IMO.
clkwrk - i agree that bryopsis is a beast and it seems that it can take po4 from anywhere quicker than any other organism
pennilessreefer - i'd agree that bryopsis can trap w/ the fern like structure. also i'm sure it can absort P eaisly into the skeleton
NuclearReefs - yep been in the same place since the day they were put in. i did add another tunze after they were in there though. and then i upgraded from a turbelle to a stream on that unit that hits the glass and disperses right by the coral in question. i don't believe teh flow is changed there. the prostrata right next to it blows like a mo fo
Big E - i've heard of the high pH thing too. just dont' like messign w/ parameters that much...seems sort of risky IMO
oligotrophic - sounds like lots of people are going w/ the po4 wicking philosophy. i'm thinking that is a good idea about removing from the rock and remount it
cieslin1 - flow looks good and everything is blowing around
KevinFJB - seems like the Rowaphos or the AZNO3 could be an additive to the recession. hope it isn't the AEFW's
Lunchbucket