New aquarium and quarantine

ramirezjrj

New member
Hi, I have a question. I have a new 90 gallon aquarium with live rock that has been cycling for 8 weeks now. All the levels have been at 0 for a couple of weeks. I want to start introducing some corals. Do I need to quarantine the corals in different tank even though I don't have anything in my display tank other than the live rock? What about fish, when I get my first fish do I need to have it quarantine in a different tank as well?

Thanks just trying to get clear on the right way to start.
 
You don't have to QT corals, You can dip them, Coral RX Dip works fine, follow the instructions carefully, they can carry "bugs" that can destroy coral colonies and infest your reef.

It's always a good idea to QT fish for a month or so to monitor them for any kind of disease and subsequent treatment.
I use a 20g set up with a heater and a hang on mechanical filter, when you have fish in there, you must keep track of ammonia levels because the tank won't be cycled, therefore, small water changes when needed will do the trick.
 
So for my first fish I shouldn't quarantine in my display tank even though I don't have any other fish in there. I know any fish after my first fish needs to be placed in a different tank.
 
So for my first fish I shouldn't quarantine in my display tank even though I don't have any other fish in there. I know any fish after my first fish needs to be placed in a different tank.

The whole point is to keep your display disease/parasite free.....so if your first fish was sick or had ick, not only could you not not treat it because of the live rock, bacteria, invertebrates, corals, etc., you would then potentially infect any other fish you put in your display, so to answer your question, no, you should NOT QT your first fish in the display.
 
I always QT my corals. If you bring in a montipora eating nudibranch you might as well tear down the tank. Not worth the risk once you get a bunch of corals.
 
I always QT my corals. If you bring in a montipora eating nudibranch you might as well tear down the tank. Not worth the risk once you get a bunch of corals.

That is what a coral dip is for....I couldn't imagine QT a coral for 30 days, it's hard enough to keep them alive in near perfect conditions, let alone in an uncycled QT tank without Hobby Grade lighting?????
 
Interesting exchange above, dips don't always get everything, and new corals in QT not the best environment, everyone has a different thinking on this one...
 
That is what a coral dip is for....I couldn't imagine QT a coral for 30 days, it's hard enough to keep them alive in near perfect conditions, let alone in an uncycled QT tank without Hobby Grade lighting?????

Coral dips don't kill the eggs. Nothing will kill the adults and the eggs that won't kill the coral. I dealt with these devils for two months and finally had to tear the tank down. I have a small cycled frag tank where I can observe the corals for a month or two before they go into the DT. If something goes wrong I only lose the corals in QT.
 
The whole point is to keep your display disease/parasite free.....so if your first fish was sick or had ick, not only could you not not treat it because of the live rock, bacteria, invertebrates, corals, etc., you would then potentially infect any other fish you put in your display, so to answer your question, no, you should NOT QT your first fish in the display.
Did you mean YES, they should quarantine? If the first fish is sick, the tank would have to be fallow for a long period before introducing more.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top