wooden_reefer
New member
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10309721#post10309721 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by wayne in norway
I recall that when most people used just LR nitrate removal was always the subject of conversation........
In reply 'I am not certain if a lot of communication with the outside world is quite essential. There is always simple diffusion. We are talking about 24/7 and a lot of observable surface area.' Actually I'm not simple diffusion is adequate. If we have a situation where anaerobic bacteria are overlain by layers of aerobic , nitrate generating bacteria, it would seem that the nitrate must pass thro' this layer to get to the anaerobic, and it strikes me that the aerobic bacteria would resist this, , and effectively separate the anaerobic bacs. gfrom the nitrate in the tank water - if any microbiologists can coment on this, I would be grateful. The advantage of a sandbed is that advection is a forcible injection of nitrate carrying waters into the area of dentrafication
"it would seem that the nitrate must pass thro' this layer to get to the anaerobic, and it strikes me that the aerobic bacteria would resist this"
I don't know for sure but I also don't see how bacteria would resist the movement of molecules of no relevence to them.
"The advantage of a sandbed is that advection is a forcible injection of nitrate carrying waters into the area of dentrafication"
There is not a lot of forced convection of water in the DSB into the deeper layer. The water passes through on the top and to a good degree dissolved gases diffuse to and from the deeper layer. N2 just floats out.