RichConley
New member
\<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9349696#post9349696 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by archie1709
I wouldn't say it is "totally" irrelevant. You may wish to ignore certain things with it, fine. You argued that the reason for the sugar was the algae present due to run-offs. Fine. That's what the article said.
But it specifically said that sugars promote growth of certain bacteria that kills or weakens the coral. So it doesn't matter whether the sugar came from a spoon in your kitchen or the fleshy algae. You can argue "complex sugar this, complex sugar that, simple sugar this, mono-whatever that". The fact is that sugars present in the reef tank promots growth of bacteria that kills or weakens the coral.
Not directly related? Sure. But TOTALLY irrelevant? I dunno
OOOORRRRRR< it could be the high nitrates and phosphates in the runoff that is causing the corals to be more prone to bacterial infection. Thres no control here. The author of the study is making a supposition that his data doesnt really support.