Randy, thanks for the reply - I've enjoyed many hours reading your articles so thanks for that.
As stealle suggested, ozone seems to be one of the most argued and subjective topic out there. In one camp, there are people that swear by ozone for keeping a perfect aquarium, removing parasites/bacteria and everything else thats gone well is attributed to the day they installed an ozonizer. On the other hand are the reef keepers that swear there is no benefit only risk.
Somewhere in between must lay the truth. To explore most of the suggested selling points, ozone is sold to achieve the following
#1 - Parasite/bacterial removal
#2 - Water clarity
#3 - Higher redox potential
To use a hypothesis for each of the above, we can reject the null hypothesis in favour of the alternate in which is ozone can make a difference to 2 and 3
Water clarity and higher redox potential is altered by the introduction of ozone although the jury must be out on the accuracy of redox measuring in relation to dosing ozone. With redox being swayed by PH and other factors, its the sum of all parts measurement and not directly linked with ozone.
Its clear science behind water clarity and oxidization of compounds.
Whats unclear is the direct effects of ozone on parasites and bacterial organisms and thereafter, the effects on beneficial bacteria. I've read lots of claims that 'ozone cured my marine whitespot' etc however there still remains little scientific proof that ozone dosing has a great effect on the parasites/bacteria in a marine aquarium. With millions of these units being sold to combat parasites - its strange that not much scientific evidence stands behind them
On the scale, you have been clear what place you believe ozone holds in the marine aquarium, do you know of any recent scientific testing for marine?
Thanks