Plemum Sand Bed Bottom (Jaubert System) Tank

herring_fish

Crazy Designer
SandSetUp.JPG


A plemum bottom was made popular in the 90's but was over sold as a stand alone system to keep nutrients down. Therefore, it fell out of favor but I think that it is a good idea for NPS tanks as only one good part of a system, along with an algae scrubber, a skimmer or some other form of primary nutrient control.

The so called Jaubert style sand bed was a home reef tank distillation of what Dr. Jaubert actually used for bigger systems. I had an article published many years ago and I am posting a link to it for those that don't really know what we are talking about. This article describes how to build one.

http://http://asaherring.com/Reef/Sandsetup.pdf
 
Looks interesting. I have ~6" sandbed in my nps tank, using real sand, not synthetic. It does a great job and I use a massive crew to keep it moving and aerated. I've always wondered why no one had come up with some system for saltwater, similar to how an under gravel filter works in freshwater tanks
 
This was part of an answer to a question about deep sand beds.

....I lowered the front of the bed so that it looked better against the front glass. Critters are suppose to inhabit the top, aerobic zone but nothing gets passed the two screens into the anaerobic zone and the stagnant zones.

I wanted to see into the plenum so before I installed anything, I encased a plasticized magnet in epoxy and placed it on the bottom piece of glass in the tank. The stand that I had, allowed me to look up through the bottom of the tank. In about a month a layer of detritus formed on the bottom glass. In a few months, I put another magnet up to the first one and was able to slowly and carefully drag it around through the sediment. I could see that it was very uniform at about 1/4 inch thick. I only did this one or two more times over 8 years or so. It wasn't too exciting.


When I tore the tank down, I was very careful, like a paleontologist. When I got through the sand beds I looked at the bottom sediment and there was that same depth of 1/4 inch of detritus that formed in the first few months.

It appeared to me that something processed this stuff. The screens are there to keep out critters and there weren't any dead skeletons, shells or any other forms of remains. This led me to think that the last vestiges of detritus must have been falling to the bottom slowly and bacteria was (...well not eating it but) processing it away. The ATS must have been the eventual vehicle for export of detritus byproducts that come from different stages of decomposition.

In nature, on dry land, fecal excrement is not the last stage of nutrient breakdown. Otherwise, we would be buried in it. It is broken down whether it is in the soil or sitting on the sidewalk. There is always something that lives off of what that last organism left behind. To some degree, this can be done inside of a closed reef system, although removal is far better where possible!!! Never the less, there is a complex food chain going up the latter before food enters a fish's gut. Likewise, there is a complex and little understood chain of organisms that process that food after it leaves the gut. "Dust to dust" and all that?

...[ refering to a standard deep sand bed ]...In a Deep Sand Bed, I would think that whatever is deposited at the bottom is pretty close to inert. In any case, I think that the ticking "nutrient bomb" is much less of a potential problem than many people think. Yes, it is a sink but a very good one.

Again, this is keeping in mind that my ATS took up waist and heavy metal that might not otherwise get processed in another tank. I don't know.

As a side note, I have a thin sand bed in my current tank that is there for cosmetic reasons only ...[because I tried a diferent kind of sump with a different cryptic zone that also included a deep sand bed.].... I kept the sand bed in the sump but took out the cryptic zone.

I do not suggest that anyone use any of these methods.

I am just reporting what I have tried.
 
Most commercial sand is synthetic, not real. There are exceptions but if you read the packages, you'll see that most state "synthetic" right on them
 
There are different kinds of sand that is real and if you don't know about it, I will add this. The Jabert system, along with many others, are based on calcium carbonate sand. Silicate based sand or beach sand can contribute to diatom blooms that can take over your tank. At least that is the experience that I gained the hard way after bringing some back from a trip to the beach and putting it in my tank.

Calcium Carbonate sand comes from broken down coral skeletons and therefore have almost exactly what living corals need to grow.

Many people believe that the sand will slowly dissolve, either through the acidic nature of saltwater by itself and/or the bacteria in the sand can make the sand more acidic and therefore brake down the sand. This helps regulate the water chemistry quite a bit.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top